Mark Hopkins1, John E Blundell2, Neil A King3. 1. Department of Sport, Health & Nutrition, Leeds Trinity University, Leeds, UK BioPsychology Group, Institute of Psychological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. 2. BioPsychology Group, Institute of Psychological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. 3. Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While compensatory eating following acute aerobic exercise is highly variable, little is known about the underlying mechanisms that contribute to the alterations in exercise-induced eating behaviour. METHODS:Overweight and obese women (body mass index=29.6±4.0 kg/m(2)) performed a bout of cycling individually tailored to expend 400 kcal (EX) or a time-matched no exercise control condition in a randomised, counter-balanced order. 60 min after the cessation of exercise, an ad libitum test meal was provided. Substrate oxidation and subjective appetite ratings were measured during exercise/time-matched rest, and during the period between the cessation of exercise and food consumption. RESULTS: While ad libitum energy intake (EI) did not differ between EX and the control condition (666.0±203.9 vs 664.6±174.4 kcal, respectively; ns), there was a marked individual variability in compensatory EI. The difference in EI between EX and the control condition ranged from -234.3 to 278.5 kcal. Carbohydrate oxidation during exercise was positively associated with postexercise EI, accounting for 37% of the variance in EI (r=0.57; p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that the capacity of acute exercise to create a short-term energy deficit in overweight and obese women is highly variable. Furthermore, exercise-induced CHO oxidation can explain a part of the variability in acute exercise-induced compensatory eating. Postexercise compensatory eating could serve as an adaptive response to facilitate the restoration of carbohydrate balance. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: While compensatory eating following acute aerobic exercise is highly variable, little is known about the underlying mechanisms that contribute to the alterations in exercise-induced eating behaviour. METHODS: Overweight and obesewomen (body mass index=29.6±4.0 kg/m(2)) performed a bout of cycling individually tailored to expend 400 kcal (EX) or a time-matched no exercise control condition in a randomised, counter-balanced order. 60 min after the cessation of exercise, an ad libitum test meal was provided. Substrate oxidation and subjective appetite ratings were measured during exercise/time-matched rest, and during the period between the cessation of exercise and food consumption. RESULTS: While ad libitum energy intake (EI) did not differ between EX and the control condition (666.0±203.9 vs 664.6±174.4 kcal, respectively; ns), there was a marked individual variability in compensatory EI. The difference in EI between EX and the control condition ranged from -234.3 to 278.5 kcal. Carbohydrate oxidation during exercise was positively associated with postexercise EI, accounting for 37% of the variance in EI (r=0.57; p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that the capacity of acute exercise to create a short-term energy deficit in overweight and obesewomen is highly variable. Furthermore, exercise-induced CHO oxidation can explain a part of the variability in acute exercise-induced compensatory eating. Postexercise compensatory eating could serve as an adaptive response to facilitate the restoration of carbohydrate balance. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Entities:
Keywords:
Exercise and/or caloric restriction effects on body weight/composition
Authors: Fernanda R Goltz; Alice E Thackray; Greg Atkinson; Lorenzo Lolli; James A King; James L Dorling; Monika Dowejko; Sarabjit Mastana; David J Stensel Journal: J Nutr Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Orla O'Sullivan; Owen Cronin; Siobhan F Clarke; Eileen F Murphy; Micheal G Molloy; Fergus Shanahan; Paul D Cotter Journal: Gut Microbes Date: 2015-03-24
Authors: S Nicole Fearnbach; Neil M Johannsen; Candice A Myers; John W Apolzan; William D Johnson; Conrad P Earnest; Jennifer C Rood; Catrine Tudor-Locke; Melissa N Harris; Timothy S Church; Corby K Martin Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2020-07-16
Authors: Paul S MacLean; Rena R Wing; Terry Davidson; Leonard Epstein; Bret Goodpaster; Kevin D Hall; Barry E Levin; Michael G Perri; Barbara J Rolls; Michael Rosenbaum; Alexander J Rothman; Donna Ryan Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2014-12-02 Impact factor: 5.002