Literature DB >> 23666015

Performance status and symptom scores of women with gynecologic cancer at the end of life.

Lori Spoozak1, Hsien Seow, Ying Liu, Jason Wright, Lisa Barbera.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Palliative Performance Scale (PPS), which measures performance status (100 = best performance to 0 = dead), and the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS), which measures severity of 9 symptoms, are routinely collected at ambulatory cancer visits in Ontario. This study describes the trajectory of scores in patients with gynecologic cancer in the last 6 months of life.
METHODS: An observational study was conducted between 2007 and 2010. Patients had ovarian/fallopian tube, uterine, and cervical cancer and required 1 or more PPS or ESAS assessment in the 6 months before death. Outcomes were the average PPS and ESAS scores per week before death. Using logistic regression, we analyzed the odds ratio of reporting a moderate to severe score for each symptom.
RESULTS: Seven hundred ninety-five (PPS) and 1299 (ESAS) patients were included. The average PPS score started at 70 and ended at 30, rapidly declining in the last 2 months. For ESAS symptoms, drowsiness, decreased well-being, lack of appetite, and tiredness increased in severity closer to death and were prevalent in more than 70% of patients in the last week of life. Patients with cervical cancer had increased odds of moderate to severe pain (1.74; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-2.32) compared with ovarian cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: Trajectories of mean performance status had not reached the "end-of-life" phase until 1 week before death. A large proportion of the gynecologic cancer patients reported moderate to severe symptom scores as death approached. Pain was uniquely elevated in the cervical cancer cohort as death approached. Adequately managing the symptom burden appears to be a significant issue in end-of-life gynecologic care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23666015     DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e318291e5ef

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  6 in total

Review 1.  The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System 25 Years Later: Past, Present, and Future Developments.

Authors:  David Hui; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 3.612

2.  Factors associated with receipt of symptom screening in the year after cancer diagnosis in a universal health care system: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  A L Mahar; L E Davis; L D Bubis; Q Li; R Sutradhar; N G Coburn; L Barbera
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Patterns of Symptoms Burden in Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Population-Based Analysis of Prospective Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Authors:  Julie Hallet; Laura E Davis; Alyson L Mahar; Calvin H L Law; Elie Isenberg-Grzeda; Lev D Bubis; Simron Singh; Sten Myrehaug; Haoyu Zhao; Kaitlyn Beyfuss; Lesley Moody; Natalie G Coburn
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-07-03

4.  Implementation of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System for Symptom Distress Screening at a Community Cancer Center: A Pilot Program.

Authors:  David Hui; Annie Titus; Tiffany Curtis; Vivian Trang Ho-Nguyen; Delisa Frederickson; Curtis Wray; Tenisha Granville; Eduardo Bruera; Donna K McKee; Alyssa Rieber
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-05-05

5.  Predictors and trajectory of performance status in patients with advanced cancer: A secondary data analysis of the international European Palliative Care Cancer Symptom study.

Authors:  Jason W Boland; Victoria Allgar; Elaine G Boland; Stein Kaasa; Marianne J Hjermstad; Miriam J Johnson
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 4.762

6.  Patient-reported symptoms in metastatic gastric cancer patients in the last 6 months of life.

Authors:  Lev D Bubis; Victoria Delibasic; Laura E Davis; Yunni Jeong; Kelvin Chan; Ekaterina Kosyachkova; Alyson Mahar; Paul Karanicolas; Natalie G Coburn
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.603

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.