Literature DB >> 23665947

Assessing crossmodal matching of abstract auditory and visual stimuli in posterior superior temporal sulcus with MEG.

Jessica R Gilbert1, Ajay S Pillai, Barry Horwitz.   

Abstract

Associating crossmodal auditory and visual stimuli is an important component of perception, with the posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS) hypothesized to support this. However, recent evidence has argued that the pSTS serves to associate two stimuli irrespective of modality. To examine the contribution of pSTS to crossmodal recognition, participants (N=13) learned 12 abstract, non-linguistic pairs of stimuli over 3weeks. These paired associates comprised four types: auditory-visual (AV), auditory-auditory (AA), visual-auditory (VA), and visual-visual (VV). At week four, participants were scanned using magnetoencephalography (MEG) while performing a correct/incorrect judgment on pairs of items. Using an implementation of synthetic aperture magnetometry that computes real statistics across trials (SAMspm), we directly contrasted crossmodal (AV and VA) with unimodal (AA and VV) pairs from stimulus-onset to 2s in theta (4-8Hz), alpha (9-15Hz), beta (16-30Hz), and gamma (31-50Hz) frequencies. We found pSTS showed greater desynchronization in the beta frequency for crossmodal compared with unimodal trials, suggesting greater activity during the crossmodal pairs, which was not influenced by congruency of the paired stimuli. Using a sliding window SAM analysis, we found the timing of this difference began in a window from 250 to 750ms after stimulus-onset. Further, when we directly contrasted all sub-types of paired associates from stimulus-onset to 2s, we found that pSTS seemed to respond to dynamic, auditory stimuli, rather than crossmodal stimuli per se. These findings support an early role for pSTS in the processing of dynamic, auditory stimuli, and do not support claims that pSTS is responsible for associating two stimuli irrespective of their modality. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23665947      PMCID: PMC3756498          DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2013.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  36 in total

1.  Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging of crossmodal binding in the human heteromodal cortex.

Authors:  G A Calvert; R Campbell; M J Brammer
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  A multivariate, spatiotemporal analysis of electromagnetic time-frequency data of recognition memory.

Authors:  E Düzel; R Habib; B Schott; A Schoenfeld; N Lobaugh; A R McIntosh; M Scholz; H J Heinze
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  The magnetic lead field theorem in the quasi-static approximation and its use for magnetoencephalography forward calculation in realistic volume conductors.

Authors:  Guido Nolte
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Polysensory interactions along lateral temporal regions evoked by audiovisual speech.

Authors:  Tarra M Wright; Kevin A Pelphrey; Truett Allison; Martin J McKeown; Gregory McCarthy
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Functionally segregated neural substrates for arbitrary audiovisual paired-association learning.

Authors:  Hiroki C Tanabe; Manabu Honda; Norihiro Sadato
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Oscillatory correlates of the primacy effect in episodic memory.

Authors:  Per B Sederberg; Lynne V Gauthier; Vitaly Terushkin; Jonathan F Miller; Julia A Barnathan; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 7.  Multisensory integration: space, time and superadditivity.

Authors:  Nicholas P Holmes; Charles Spence
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-09-20       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 8.  Lesion analysis of the brain areas involved in language comprehension.

Authors:  Nina F Dronkers; David P Wilkins; Robert D Van Valin; Brenda B Redfern; Jeri J Jaeger
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004 May-Jun

9.  Gamma rhythms and beta rhythms have different synchronization properties.

Authors:  N Kopell; G B Ermentrout; M A Whittington; R D Traub
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Oscillatory power decreases and long-term memory: the information via desynchronization hypothesis.

Authors:  Simon Hanslmayr; Tobias Staudigl; Marie-Christin Fellner
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Spatiotemporal Neural Dynamics of Intersensory Attention Capture of Salient Stimuli: A Large-Scale Auditory-Visual Modeling Study.

Authors:  Qin Liu; Antonio Ulloa; Barry Horwitz
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 3.387

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.