Lianyue Yang1, Jiangfeng Xu, Dipeng Ou, Wei Wu, Zhijun Zeng. 1. Liver Cancer Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha 410008, Hunan, China. lianyueyang@hotmail.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The surgical resection of huge hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still controversial. This study was designed to introduce our experience of liver resection for huge HCC and evaluate the safety and outcomes of hepatectomy for huge HCC. METHODS: A total of 258 hepatic resections for the patients with huge HCC were analysed retrospectively from December 2002 to December 2011. The operative outcomes were compared with 293 patients with HCC >5.0 cm but <10.0 cm in diameter. Prognostic factors for long-term survival were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The 1-, 3-, 5-year overall survival rates after liver resection were 84, 62, and 33 %. Overall survival and disease-free survival in huge HCC group and HCC >5.0 cm but <10.0 cm group were similar (P = 0.751, P = 0.493). Solitary huge HCC group has significantly a more longer overall and disease-free survival time than nodular huge HCC (P = 0.026, P = 0.022). Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that the types of tumour, vascular invasion, and UICC stage were independent prognostic factors for overall survival (P = 0.047, P = 0.037, P = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic resection can be performed safely for huge HCC with a low mortality and favorable survival outcomes. Solitary huge HCC has the better surgical outcomes than nodular huge HCC.
BACKGROUND: The surgical resection of huge hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still controversial. This study was designed to introduce our experience of liver resection for huge HCC and evaluate the safety and outcomes of hepatectomy for huge HCC. METHODS: A total of 258 hepatic resections for the patients with huge HCC were analysed retrospectively from December 2002 to December 2011. The operative outcomes were compared with 293 patients with HCC >5.0 cm but <10.0 cm in diameter. Prognostic factors for long-term survival were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The 1-, 3-, 5-year overall survival rates after liver resection were 84, 62, and 33 %. Overall survival and disease-free survival in huge HCC group and HCC >5.0 cm but <10.0 cm group were similar (P = 0.751, P = 0.493). Solitary huge HCC group has significantly a more longer overall and disease-free survival time than nodular huge HCC (P = 0.026, P = 0.022). Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that the types of tumour, vascular invasion, and UICC stage were independent prognostic factors for overall survival (P = 0.047, P = 0.037, P = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic resection can be performed safely for huge HCC with a low mortality and favorable survival outcomes. Solitary huge HCC has the better surgical outcomes than nodular huge HCC.
Authors: Eddie K Abdalla; Alban Denys; Kiyoshi Hasegawa; Thomas W T Leung; Masatoshi Makuuchi; Ravi Murthy; Dario Ribero; Daria Zorzi; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Guido Torzilli Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2008-01-31 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Timothy M Pawlik; Keith A Delman; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; David M Nagorney; Irene Oi-Lin Ng; Iwao Ikai; Yoshio Yamaoka; Jacques Belghiti; Gregory Y Lauwers; Ronnie T Poon; Eddie K Abdalla Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 5.799
Authors: Gi Hong Choi; Dai Hoon Han; Dong Hyun Kim; Sae Byeol Choi; Chang Moo Kang; Kyung Sik Kim; Jin Sub Choi; Young Nyun Park; Jun Yong Park; Do Young Kim; Kwang-Hyub Han; Chae Yoon Chon; Woo Jung Lee Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2009-03-06 Impact factor: 2.565