Literature DB >> 2366563

Aortic valve decalcification.

L R McBride1, K S Naunheim, A C Fiore, H H Harris, V L Willman, G C Kaiser, D G Pennington, A J Labovitz, H B Barner.   

Abstract

Ultrasonic decalcification of the aortic valve was performed in 22 elderly patients with critical aortic stenosis (aortic valve areas less than 0.8 cm2) as an alternative to prosthetic valve replacement. All of the patients had symptoms. The mean New York Heart Association class was 3.3 +/- 0.9. Adequate decalcification with restoration of leaflet mobility was achieved in all patients, including seven with bicuspid aortic valves. Leaflet perforation occurred and was successfully repaired in five patients. Ten patients underwent concomitant myocardial revascularization. There were two operative deaths (9%) and three late deaths. Echocardiograms were obtained preoperatively, postoperatively, and at 6 months. The mean aortic valve area increased significantly from 0.72 +/- 0.17 to 1.42 +/- 0.31 cm2 (p less than 0.001) and the peak gradient decreased from 74 +/- 34 to 25 +/- 13 mm Hg (p less than 0.001). At 6 months the aortic valve area (1.29 +/- 0.48 cm2) and peak gradient (31 +/- 12 mm Hg) continued to be significantly better than the preoperative measurements (p less than 0.001), but the 6-month aortic valve area was slightly decreased and the gradient increased when compared with the immediate postoperative values (p less than 0.02). The prevalence of mild to moderate aortic insufficiency increased from 50% of the patients preoperatively to 87% at 6 months (p less than 0.05). Two patients subsequently required aortic valve replacement for restenosis and aortic insufficiency. Ultrasonic decalcification is effective in relieving aortic stenosis, but subsequent restenosis and insufficiency may limit its application.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2366563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  4 in total

Review 1.  Surgical treatment of aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Tirone E David
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Ultrasonic decalcification of calcified valve and annulus during heart valve replacement.

Authors:  M Unal; I Sanisoğlu; C Konuralp; H Akay; G Orhan; H Aydoğan; S A Aka; E E Eren
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1996

3.  A new ultrasonic process for a renewal of aortic valve decalcification.

Authors:  Stéphane Aubert; Eric Voiglio; Lara Chalabreysse; Fadi Farhat; Olivier Jegaden
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2006-01-05       Impact factor: 2.062

Review 4.  The Genetic Regulation of Aortic Valve Development and Calcific Disease.

Authors:  Vinal Menon; Joy Lincoln
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-11-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.