Literature DB >> 23665458

Phase I dose-escalation study and population pharmacokinetic analysis of fixed dose rate gemcitabine plus carboplatin as second-line therapy in patients with ovarian cancer.

Suzanne Leijen1, Stephan A Veltkamp, Alwin D R Huitema, E van Werkhoven, Jos H Beijnen, Jan H M Schellens.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This phase I study of fixed dose rate (FDR) gemcitabine and carboplatin assessed the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), safety, pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) profile and preliminary anti-tumor activity in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer (OC).
METHODS: Patients with recurrent OC after first line treatment were treated with carboplatin and FDR gemcitabine (infusion speed 10mg/m(2)/min) on days 1, 8 and 15, every 28 days. Pharmacokinetics included measurement of platinum concentrations in plasma ultrafiltrate (pUF) and plasma concentrations of gemcitabine (dFdC) and metabolite dFdU. Intracellular levels of dFdC triphosphate (dFdC-TP), the most active metabolite of gemcitabine, were determined in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Population pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation were performed to further investigate the optimal schedule.
RESULTS: Twenty three patients were enrolled. Initial dose escalation was performed using FDR gemcitabine 300 mg/m(2) (administered at infusion speed of 10 mg/m(2)/min) combined with carboplatin AUC 2.5 and 3. Excessive bone marrow toxicity led to a modified dose escalation schedule: carboplatin AUC 2 and dose escalation of FDR gemcitabine (300 mg/m(2), 450 mg/m(2), 600 mg/m(2) and 800 mg/m(2)). DLT criteria as defined per protocol prior to the study were not met with carboplatin AUC 2 in combination with FDR gemcitabine 300-800 mg/m(2) because of myelosuppressive dose-holds (especially thrombocytopenia and neutropenia).
CONCLUSIONS: FDR gemcitabine in combination with carboplatin administered in this 28 days schedule resulted in increased grade 3/4 toxicity compared to conventional 30-minute infused gemcitabine. A two weekly schedule (chemotherapy on days 1 and 8) would be more appropriate.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carboplatin; Chemotherapy; Fixed dose rate; Gemcitabine; Ovarian cancer; Population pharmacokinetics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23665458     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  4 in total

1.  Activator protein 1 promotes gemcitabine-induced apoptosis in pancreatic cancer by upregulating its downstream target Bim.

Authors:  Xiaoxia Ren; Wenjing Zhao; Yongxing Du; Taiping Zhang; Lei You; Yupei Zhao
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  Is age just a number? A population pharmacokinetic study of gemcitabine.

Authors:  René J Boosman; Marie-Rose B S Crombag; Nielka P van Erp; Jos H Beijnen; Neeltje Steeghs; Alwin D R Huitema
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 3.288

3.  A Potent Chemotherapeutic Strategy with Eg5 Inhibitor against Gemcitabine Resistant Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Liang Sun; Jiaju Lu; Zhihong Niu; Kejia Ding; Dongbin Bi; Shuai Liu; Jiamei Li; Fei Wu; Hui Zhang; Zuohui Zhao; Sentai Ding
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Centromere protein U is a potential target for gene therapy of human bladder cancer.

Authors:  Sheng Wang; Beibei Liu; Jiajun Zhang; Wei Sun; Changyuan Dai; Wenyan Sun; Qingwen Li
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 3.906

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.