Literature DB >> 23665130

Technological, biological, and acoustical constraints to music perception in cochlear implant users.

Charles J Limb1, Alexis T Roy2.   

Abstract

Despite advances in technology, the ability to perceive music remains limited for many cochlear implant users. This paper reviews the technological, biological, and acoustical constraints that make music an especially challenging stimulus for cochlear implant users, while highlighting recent research efforts to overcome these shortcomings. The limitations of cochlear implant devices, which have been optimized for speech comprehension, become evident when applied to music, particularly with regards to inadequate spectral, fine-temporal, and dynamic range representation. Beyond the impoverished information transmitted by the device itself, both peripheral and central auditory nervous system deficits are seen in the presence of sensorineural hearing loss, such as auditory nerve degeneration and abnormal auditory cortex activation. These technological and biological constraints to effective music perception are further compounded by the complexity of the acoustical features of music itself that require the perceptual integration of varying rhythmic, melodic, harmonic, and timbral elements of sound. Cochlear implant users not only have difficulty perceiving spectral components individually (leading to fundamental disruptions in perception of pitch, melody, and harmony) but also display deficits with higher perceptual integration tasks required for music perception, such as auditory stream segregation. Despite these current limitations, focused musical training programs, new assessment methods, and improvements in the representation and transmission of the complex acoustical features of music through technological innovation offer the potential for significant advancements in cochlear implant-mediated music perception.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23665130     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  56 in total

1.  Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery at Johns Hopkins: The first 100 years (1914-2014).

Authors:  Howard W Francis; Ira Papel; Ioan Lina; Wayne Koch; David Tunkel; Paul Fuchs; Sandra Lin; David Kennedy; Robert Ruben; Fred Linthicum; Bernard Marsh; Simon Best; John Carey; Andrew Lane; Patrick Byrne; Paul Flint; David W Eisele
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Beyond Technology: The Interaction of Perceptual Accuracy and Experiential Factors in Pediatric Music Engagement.

Authors:  Kate Gfeller; Virginia Driscoll; Adam Schwalje
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  A Randomized Controlled Crossover Study of the Impact of Online Music Training on Pitch and Timbre Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Nicole T Jiam; Mickael L Deroche; Patpong Jiradejvong; Charles J Limb
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-02-27

4.  The perception of emotion and focus prosody with varying acoustic cues in cochlear implant simulations with varying filter slopes.

Authors:  Daan J van de Velde; Niels O Schiller; Vincent J van Heuven; Claartje C Levelt; Joost van Ginkel; Mieke Beers; Jeroen J Briaire; Johan H M Frijns
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Music-based training for pediatric CI recipients: A systematic analysis of published studies.

Authors:  K Gfeller
Journal:  Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 2.080

6.  The impact of electric hearing on children's timbre and pitch perception and talker discrimination.

Authors:  Kristin M Sjoberg; Virginia D Driscoll; Kate Gfeller; Anne E Welhaven; Karen Iler Kirk; Lindsay Prusick
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2017-01-18

7.  Verbal Learning and Memory After Cochlear Implantation in Postlingually Deaf Adults: Some New Findings with the CVLT-II.

Authors:  David B Pisoni; Arthur Broadstock; Taylor Wucinich; Natalie Safdar; Kelly Miller; Luis R Hernandez; Kara Vasil; Lauren Boyce; Alexandra Davies; Michael S Harris; Irina Castellanos; Huiping Xu; William G Kronenberger; Aaron C Moberly
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Do communication disorders extend to musical messages? An answer from children with hearing loss or autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Christina M Whipple; Kate Gfeller; Virginia Driscoll; Jacob Oleson; Karla McGregor
Journal:  J Music Ther       Date:  2015-02-17

9.  Reduction of the Harmonic Series Influences Musical Enjoyment With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  John S Nemer; Gavriel D Kohlberg; Dean M Mancuso; Brianna M Griffin; Michael V Certo; Stephanie Y Chen; Michael B Chun; Jaclyn B Spitzer; Anil K Lalwani
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 10.  Functional near-infrared spectroscopy for neuroimaging in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Joe Saliba; Heather Bortfeld; Daniel J Levitin; John S Oghalai
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.