Literature DB >> 23665123

Post-operative complications following primary ACL reconstruction using allogenic and autogenic soft tissue grafts: increased relative morbidity risk is associated with increased graft diameter.

Dennis C Crawford1, Sara E Hallvik, Ryan C Petering, Samantha M Quilici, Loren O Black, Stephanie A Lavigne, Jodi Lapidus, Lynn M Marshall.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to compare the risk of peri-operative complication events associated with allogenic and autogenic grafts during routine follow-up for six months after primary arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study identified patients that underwent ACL reconstruction via an arthroscopically assisted single tunnel technique. Fixation was primarily cortical suspension (endobutton) from the femora and bicortical fixation (Washer-loc) in the tibia. Patients were monitored for six months following surgery. Morbidity was defined as complications during this period requiring medical or surgical intervention. Risk of complications was compared according to tissue type and patient characteristics. The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel method was applied to estimate risk ratios (RR) and confidence intervals (CI) as the measure of association between graft type and morbidity risk.
RESULTS: The cohort included 413 eligible patients. Sixty six percent received allograft tissue, while the remainder received autograft tissue. Morbidity risk was 7.0% among patients receiving allograft tissue and 2.8% among patients receiving autograft tissue. Allograft demonstrated elevated risk of complication versus autograft (RR=2.3 (95% CI: 0.9-7.2)), though the data are of borderline significance (p=0.11). Complications were associated with larger graft diameter in comparison to patients who experienced no complication (9.0+/-1.2 mm v. 8.4+/-1.0mm, p=0.005).
CONCLUSION: The relative morbidity risk was about two-fold greater among patients receiving allograft tissue. Regardless of tissue type, graft size was larger among patients who experienced a complication. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL allograft reconstruction; ACL autograft reconstruction; ACL reconstruction complications; Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23665123     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2013.04.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  7 in total

1.  Italian consensus statement for the use of allografts in ACL reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Corrado Bait; Pietro Randelli; Riccardo Compagnoni; Paolo Ferrua; Rocco Papalia; Filippo Familiari; Andrea Tecame; Paolo Adravanti; Ezio Adriani; Enrico Arnaldi; Franco Benazzo; Massimo Berruto; Giovanni Bonaspetti; Gian Luigi Canata; Pier Paolo Canè; Araldo Causero; Giancarlo Coari; Matteo Denti; Maristella Farè; Andrea Ferretti; Marco Fravisini; Francesco Giron; Alberto Gobbi; Vincenzo Madonna; Andrea Manunta; Pier Paolo Mariani; Claudio Mazzola; Giuseppe Milano; Luigi Pederzini; Flavio Quaglia; Mario Ronga; Herbert Schönhuber; Giacomo Stefani; Piero Volpi; Giacomo Zanon; Raul Zini; Claudio Zorzi; Stefano Zaffagnini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-06-02       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  A Systematic Review of Failed Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Autograft Compared With Allograft in Young Patients.

Authors:  David Wasserstein; Ujash Sheth; Alison Cabrera; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.843

3.  Injury to infrapatellar branch of saphenous nerve in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using vertical skin incision for hamstring harvesting: risk factors and the influence of treatment outcome.

Authors:  Satoshi Ochiai; Tetsuo Hagino; Shinya Senga; Takashi Yamashita; Kotaro Oda; Hirotaka Haro
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  The Combined Effect of Body Mass Index and Tibial Slope Angles on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk in Male Knees: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Volkan Kızılgöz; Ali Kemal Sivrioğlu; Hasan Aydın; Gökhan Ragıp Ulusoy; Türkhun Çetin; Kutsi Tuncer
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-08-01

5.  The outcomes of quadriceps tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in adolescent athletes: a retrospective case series.

Authors:  Natalie H Vaughn; Mark L Dunleavy; Trevor Jackson; William Hennrikus
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-06-10

6.  Differentiating Occult Propionibacterium acnes Infection From Aseptic "Biologic" Interference Screw Hydrolysis After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Introducing a Novel Culture Protocol for Detecting Low-Virulence Organisms.

Authors:  Kathryn Metcalf; Jia-Wei Kevin Ko; Samantha Quilici; Penelope Barnes; Dennis C Crawford
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2015-10-23

7.  Predicting the graft diameter of the peroneus longus tendon for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Xiaoxiao Song; Qiangqiang Li; Zongfang Wu; Qian Xu; Dongyang Chen; Qing Jiang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.817

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.