Robin B Holmes1, Sandra M A Hoffman2, Paul M Kemp3. 1. Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University Hospitals Bristol, UK. Electronic address: robin.holmes@nhs.net. 2. Nuclear Medicine Physics Group, University Hospital Southampton, UK. 3. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Southampton, UK.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Traditional interpretation of rCBF SPECT data is of a qualitative nature and is dependent on the observer's understanding of the normal distribution of the tracer. The use of a normal database in quantitative regional analysis facilitates the detection of functional abnormality in individual and group studies by accounting for inter-subject variability. The ability to simulate realistic images would allow various important areas related to the use of normal databases to be studied. These include the optimisation of the detection of abnormal blood flow and the portability of normal databases between gamma camera systems. To investigate this further we have constructed a hardware phantom and scanned various configurations of radioactive brain patterns and simulated skull configurations. METHODS: A subresolution sandwich phantom was constructed with a simulated skull which was assembled using a high-resolution segmented MR scan printed with a (99m)TcO₄ - mixture and scanned using a double-headed gamma camera with parallel-hole collimators. Various different grey-to-white matter (GM:WM) ratios and aluminium simulated skull configurations were used. A single difference measure between the phantom data and a control database mean image was used for optimisation. The realism of phantom data was assessed using statistical parametric mapping (SPM) and ROI analysis. RESULTS: Optimisation was achieved with a range of WM:GM ratios from 1.9 to 2.4:1 with various simulated skull configurations. CONCLUSION: The ability to simulate realistic HMPAO SPECT scans has been demonstrated using a subresolution sandwich phantom. Further work, involving scanning the optimised phantom on different gamma camera systems and comparison with camera-specific normal databases should further refine the phantom configuration.
UNLABELLED: Traditional interpretation of rCBF SPECT data is of a qualitative nature and is dependent on the observer's understanding of the normal distribution of the tracer. The use of a normal database in quantitative regional analysis facilitates the detection of functional abnormality in individual and group studies by accounting for inter-subject variability. The ability to simulate realistic images would allow various important areas related to the use of normal databases to be studied. These include the optimisation of the detection of abnormal blood flow and the portability of normal databases between gamma camera systems. To investigate this further we have constructed a hardware phantom and scanned various configurations of radioactive brain patterns and simulated skull configurations. METHODS: A subresolution sandwich phantom was constructed with a simulated skull which was assembled using a high-resolution segmented MR scan printed with a (99m)TcO₄ - mixture and scanned using a double-headed gamma camera with parallel-hole collimators. Various different grey-to-white matter (GM:WM) ratios and aluminium simulated skull configurations were used. A single difference measure between the phantom data and a control database mean image was used for optimisation. The realism of phantom data was assessed using statistical parametric mapping (SPM) and ROI analysis. RESULTS: Optimisation was achieved with a range of WM:GM ratios from 1.9 to 2.4:1 with various simulated skull configurations. CONCLUSION: The ability to simulate realistic HMPAO SPECT scans has been demonstrated using a subresolution sandwich phantom. Further work, involving scanning the optimised phantom on different gamma camera systems and comparison with camera-specific normal databases should further refine the phantom configuration.
Authors: Tilman Läppchen; Lorenz P Meier; Markus Fürstner; George A Prenosil; Thomas Krause; Axel Rominger; Bernd Klaeser; Michael Hentschel Journal: EJNMMI Phys Date: 2020-04-22
Authors: Jonathan C Taylor; Nicholas Vennart; Ian Negus; Robin Holmes; Oliver Bandmann; Christine Lo; John Fenner Journal: Nucl Med Commun Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 1.690