Literature DB >> 23664808

Translumbar hemodialysis catheters in patients with limited central venous access: does patient size matter?

Gregory J Nadolski1, Scott O Trerotola, S William Stavropoulos, Richard D Shlansky-Goldberg, Michael C Soulen, Cormac Farrelly.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe a single institutional experience with translumbar tunneled dialysis catheters (TDC) and compare outcomes between patients with normal and abnormal body mass index (BMI).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Translumbar TDCs placed between January 2002 and July 2011 were reviewed retrospectively. There were 33 patients; 18 had a normal BMI<25, and 15 had an abnormal BMI>25. Technical outcome, complications, indications for exchange or removal, and BMI were recorded. Catheter dwell time, catheter occlusion rate, frequency of malposition, and infection rates were collected.
RESULTS: There were 92 procedures (33 initial placements) with 7,825 catheter days. The technical success rate was 100%. Two minor (2.2%) and three major (3.3%) complications occurred. The complication rate did not differ significantly between patients with a normal BMI and patients with an abnormal BMI. Median catheter time in situ (interquartile range) for all patients was 61 (113) days, for patients with normal BMI was 66 (114) days, and for patients with abnormal BMI was 56 (105) days (P = .9). Primary device service intervals for all patients, patients with normal BMI, and patients with abnormal BMI were 47 (96) days, 63 (98) days, and 39 (55) days (P = .1). Secondary device service intervals for all patients, patients with normal BMI, and patients with abnormal BMI were 147 (386) days, 109 (124) days, and 409 (503) days (P = .23). Catheter-related central venous thrombosis rate was 0.01 per 100 catheter days (n = 1).
CONCLUSIONS: Translumbar TDC placement can provide effective hemodialysis in patients with limited venous reserve regardless of the patient's BMI. An abnormal BMI (>25) does not significantly affect complication rate, median catheter time in situ, or primary or secondary device service interval of translumbar TDCs.
Copyright © 2013 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23664808     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.02.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  5 in total

1.  A Patient with Recurrent Arteriovenous Graft Thrombosis.

Authors:  Michael Allon
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Patency and Complications of Translumbar Dialysis Catheters.

Authors:  Fanna Liu; Stacy Bennett; Susana Arrigain; Jesse Schold; Robert Heyka; Gordon McLennan; Sankar D Navaneethan
Journal:  Semin Dial       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 3.  Hemodialysis Catheters: Update on Types, Outcomes, Designs and Complications.

Authors:  Husameddin El Khudari; Merve Ozen; Bridget Kowalczyk; Juri Bassuner; Ammar Almehmi
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  Arteriovenous Access: Infection, Neuropathy, and Other Complications.

Authors:  Jennifer M MacRae; Christine Dipchand; Matthew Oliver; Louise Moist; Serdar Yilmaz; Charmaine Lok; Kelvin Leung; Edward Clark; Swapnil Hiremath; Joanne Kappel; Mercedeh Kiaii; Rick Luscombe; Lisa M Miller
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2016-09-27

5.  Early complications of translumbar cannulation of the inferior vena cava as a quick, last-chance method of gaining access for hemodialysis. Ten years of experience in one clinical center.

Authors:  Jarosław Leś; Sebastian Spaleniak; Arkadiusz Lubas; Stanisław Niemczyk; Grzegorz Kade
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 1.195

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.