Literature DB >> 23664798

Reliable support: Measuring calibration of likelihood ratios.

Daniel Ramos1, Joaquin Gonzalez-Rodriguez.   

Abstract

Calculation of likelihood ratios (LR) in evidence evaluation still presents major challenges in many forensic disciplines: for instance, an incorrect selection of databases, a bad choice of statistical models, low quantity and bad quality of the evidence are factors that may lead to likelihood ratios supporting the wrong proposition in a given case. However, measuring performance of LR values is not straightforward, and adequate metrics should be defined and used. With this objective, in this work we describe the concept of calibration, a property of a set of LR values. We highlight that some desirable behavior of LR values happens if they are well calibrated. Moreover, we propose a tool for representing performance, the Empirical Cross-Entropy (ECE) plot, showing that it can explicitly measure calibration of LR values. We finally describe some examples using speech evidence, where the usefulness of ECE plots and the measurement of calibration is shown.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Year:  2013        PMID: 23664798     DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.04.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int        ISSN: 0379-0738            Impact factor:   2.395


  7 in total

1.  Gaussian Mixture Models of Between-Source Variation for Likelihood Ratio Computation from Multivariate Data.

Authors:  Javier Franco-Pedroso; Daniel Ramos; Joaquin Gonzalez-Rodriguez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Deconstructing Cross-Entropy for Probabilistic Binary Classifiers.

Authors:  Daniel Ramos; Javier Franco-Pedroso; Alicia Lozano-Diez; Joaquin Gonzalez-Rodriguez
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 2.524

Review 3.  A Review of Probabilistic Genotyping Systems: EuroForMix, DNAStatistX and STRmix™.

Authors:  Peter Gill; Corina Benschop; John Buckleton; Øyvind Bleka; Duncan Taylor
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 4.096

4.  The strange persistence of (source) "identification" claims in forensic literature through descriptivism, diagnosticism and machinism.

Authors:  Alex Biedermann
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Synerg       Date:  2022-03-02

5.  Utilization of Machine Learning for the Differentiation of Positional NPS Isomers with Direct Analysis in Real Time Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Jennifer L Bonetti; Saer Samanipour; Arian C van Asten
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  In the context of forensic casework, are there meaningful metrics of the degree of calibration?

Authors:  Geoffrey Stewart Morrison
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Synerg       Date:  2021-06-12

Review 7.  Bayesian Hierarchical Random Effects Models in Forensic Science.

Authors:  Colin G G Aitken
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 4.599

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.