Literature DB >> 23664747

Complications and revision rate compared by type of total elbow arthroplasty.

Sang-Eun Park1, Jung-Youn Kim, Sung-Wook Cho, Seung-Koo Rhee, Soon-Yong Kwon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the long-term results, including complication and revision rates, of different types of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) with an average follow up of 13 years.
METHODS: Since 1984, a total of 84 primary TEAs have been performed in 77 patients at our institution. The patient's average age was 54.2 years. We performed unlinked TEA in 35 cases (Pritchard ERS since 1984 [n = 18], Kudo type 3 since 1991 [n = 17]), and semi-linked TEA in 49 cases (Pritchard Mark II since 1997 [n = 14], Coonrad-Morrey since 2001 [n = 35]). We assessed the patients for compliance to daily living guidelines (not to exceed 2.25 kg for repetitive lifting and 4.5 kg for single episode lifting), and followed up with them for an average of 13 years after primary TEA. We analyzed their results with regard to complication and revision rates as the type of TEA.
RESULTS: The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) improved from preoperative 34 points to postoperative 84 points. The active flexion-extension elbow motion increased from 25°-94° preoperative to 12°-130° postoperative. The overall complication rate was 44.0% (37/84 cases); the rate was statistically higher in the unlinked group (62.9%, 22/35 cases) than in the semi-linked group (30.6%, 15/49 cases). The overall revision rate was 27.4% (23/84 cases); the rate was higher in the unlinked group (34.3%, 12/35 cases) than in the semi-linked group (22.4%, 11/49 cases).
CONCLUSION: Semi-linked TEA has better outcomes than unlinked TEA with respect to complication and revision rates; but continuous efforts to develop a new TEA design for longevity, improved cementing technique, and supporting activities of daily living are needed to reduce complication and revision rates in the future.
Copyright © 2013 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Elbow; Level III; Retrospective Cohort Study; Treatment Study; complication; design; revision; total elbow arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23664747     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  9 in total

1.  Trends in total elbow arthroplasty: a nationwide analysis in Germany from 2005 to 2014.

Authors:  Alexander Klug; Yves Gramlich; Johannes Buckup; Uwe Schweigkofler; Reinhard Hoffmann; Kay Schmidt-Horlohé
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Clinical results of revision total elbow arthroplasty: comparison of infected and non-infected total elbow arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jae-Man Kwak; Erica Kholinne; Yucheng Sun; Myung-Sun Kim; Kyoung-Hwan Koh; In-Ho Jeon
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Staged revision still works for chronic and deep infection of total elbow arthroplasty?

Authors:  Jae-Man Kwak; Sang-Pil So; In-Ho Jeon
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2022-05-26

4.  Primary total elbow arthroplasty in complex fractures of the distal humerus.

Authors:  Brian Weng Sørensen; Stig Brorson; Bo Sanderhoff Olsen
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-07-18

5.  Total elbow arthroplasty: a radiographic outcome study.

Authors:  Xue Susan Bai; Jonelle M Petscavage-Thomas; Alice S Ha
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 6.  Scoping review: Diagnosis and management of periprosthetic joint infection in elbow arthroplasty.

Authors:  A C Watts; A D Duckworth; I A Trail; J Rees; M Thomas; A Rangan
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2018-07-27

7.  One- and two-stage surgical revision of infected elbow prostheses following total joint replacement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Setor K Kunutsor; Andrew D Beswick; Michael R Whitehouse; Ashley W Blom
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Use and outcome of 1,220 primary total elbow arthroplasties from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Arthroplasty Replacement Registry 2008-2018.

Authors:  Jetske Viveen; Michel P J van den Bekerom; Job N Doornberg; Alesha Hatton; Richard Page; Koen L M Koenraadt; Christopher Wilson; Gregory I Bain; Ruurd L Jaarsma; Denise Eygendaal
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 9.  Total Elbow Arthroplasty: Clinical Outcomes, Complications, and Revision Surgery.

Authors:  Jae-Man Kwak; Kyoung-Hwan Koh; In-Ho Jeon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-11-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.