Literature DB >> 23664427

Clinical and radiological results of femoral head structural allograft for severe bone defects in revision TKA--a minimum 8-year follow-up.

Churl Hong Chun1, Jeong Woo Kim2, Sung Hun Kim2, Bong Gyu Kim2, Keun Churl Chun2, Kwang Mee Kim3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Proper treatment of bone loss is essential for the long term durability of revision TKA. However, the method of choice in managing large bone defects is still under debate. We therefore assessed the mid to long term clinical and radiographic results of revision TKA using a fresh frozen femoral head allograft and a standard condylar implant or varus-valgus constrained prosthesis with a diaphyseal-engaging stem.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 27 patients who had undergone revision TKA between August 1997 and March 2003 using a fresh frozen femoral head allograft and a standard condylar implant or varus-valgus constrained prosthesis with a diaphyseal-engaging stem. The median follow-up period was 107 months (range, 96-157 months).
RESULTS: Clinical evaluation revealed that the mean range of motion had increased from 71° to 113° and the mean Hospital for Special Surgery knee score had improved from 46 to 83 points. The overall tibio-femoral angle improved from varus 7.3° to valgus 6.l°. In 26 out of 27 knees, union was demonstrated at an average of seven months postoperatively, and there were no cases of collapse, disease transmission or stress fractures. In one knee, an infection recurred.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that femoral head allografts in treatment of severe bone defects are reliable and durable. If possible, less constrained prostheses with diaphyseal-engaging stems should be chosen for increased durability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allograft; Bone defect; Revision TKA

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23664427     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2013.04.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  13 in total

1.  No Difference Between Trabecular Metal Cones and Femoral Head Allografts in Revision TKA: Minimum 5-year Followup.

Authors:  Nemandra A Sandiford; Peter Misur; Donald S Garbuz; Nelson V Greidanus; Bassam A Masri
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Tantalum Cones Provide Durable Mid-term Fixation in Revision TKA.

Authors:  Ivan De Martino; Vincenzo De Santis; Peter K Sculco; Rocco D'Apolito; Joseph B Assini; Giorgio Gasparini
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Bone defect classifications in revision total knee arthroplasty, their reliability and utility: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yasim Khan; Sumit Arora; Abhishek Kashyap; Mohit Kumar Patralekh; Lalit Maini
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-07-03       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 4.  [Bone defect management in revision knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  Eric Röhner; Markus Heinecke; Georg Matziolis
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 5.  Bone loss in aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty: management and outcomes.

Authors:  Thomas Bieganowski; Daniel B Buchalter; Vivek Singh; John J Mercuri; Vinay K Aggarwal; Joshua C Rozell; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2022-06-20

6.  Tibial bone loss in revision TKA: Options for management without sleeves and cones -a schematic review.

Authors:  Sibin Surendran; P Gopinathan
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-01-17

7.  Stem cell therapy for enhancement of bone consolidation in distraction osteogenesis: A contemporary review of experimental studies.

Authors:  Y Yang; S Lin; B Wang; W Gu; G Li
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 5.853

8.  A case of bilateral revision total knee arthroplasty using distal femoral allograft-prosthesis composite and femoral head allografting at the tibial site with a varus-valgus constrained prosthesis: ten-year follow up.

Authors:  Sung-Hyun Lee; Sung-Hyun Noh; Keun-Churl Chun; Joung-Kyue Han; Churl-Hong Chun
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  A prospective study on outcome of patient-specific cones in revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alexander A Cherny; Anton N Kovalenko; Taras A Kulyaba; Nikolai N Kornilov
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alan de Paula Mozella; Hugo Alexandre de Araújo Barros Cobra
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2020-09-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.