INTRODUCTION: The role of flow on the progression of left ventricular (LV) remodeling has been presumed, although measurements are still limited and the intraventricular flow pattern in remodeling hearts has not been evaluated in a clinical setting. Comparative evaluation of intraventricular fluid dynamics is performed here between healthy subjects and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) patients. METHODS: LV fluid dynamics is evaluated in 20 healthy young men and 8 DCM patients by combination of 3D echocardiography with direct numerical simulations of the equation governing blood motion. Results are analyzed in terms of quantitative global indicators of flow energetics and blood transit properties that are representative of the qualitative fluid dynamics behaviors. RESULTS: The flow in DCM exhibited qualitative differences due to the weakness of the formed vortices in the large LV chamber. DCM and healthy subjects show significant volumetric differences; these also reflect inflow properties like the vortex formation time, energy dissipation, and sub-volumes describing flow transit. Proper normalization permitted to define purely fluid dynamics indicators that are not influenced by volumetric measures. CONCLUSION: Cardiac fluid mechanics can be evaluated by a combination of imaging and numerical simulation. This pilot study on pathological changes in LV blood motion identified intraventricular flow indicators based on pure fluid mechanics that could potentially be integrated with existing indicators of cardiac mechanics in the evaluation of disease progression.
INTRODUCTION: The role of flow on the progression of left ventricular (LV) remodeling has been presumed, although measurements are still limited and the intraventricular flow pattern in remodeling hearts has not been evaluated in a clinical setting. Comparative evaluation of intraventricular fluid dynamics is performed here between healthy subjects and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) patients. METHODS: LV fluid dynamics is evaluated in 20 healthy young men and 8 DCMpatients by combination of 3D echocardiography with direct numerical simulations of the equation governing blood motion. Results are analyzed in terms of quantitative global indicators of flow energetics and blood transit properties that are representative of the qualitative fluid dynamics behaviors. RESULTS: The flow in DCM exhibited qualitative differences due to the weakness of the formed vortices in the large LV chamber. DCM and healthy subjects show significant volumetric differences; these also reflect inflow properties like the vortex formation time, energy dissipation, and sub-volumes describing flow transit. Proper normalization permitted to define purely fluid dynamics indicators that are not influenced by volumetric measures. CONCLUSION: Cardiac fluid mechanics can be evaluated by a combination of imaging and numerical simulation. This pilot study on pathological changes in LV blood motion identified intraventricular flow indicators based on pure fluid mechanics that could potentially be integrated with existing indicators of cardiac mechanics in the evaluation of disease progression.
Authors: Gianni Pedrizzetti; Alfonso R Martiniello; Valter Bianchi; Antonio D'Onofrio; Pio Caso; Giovanni Tonti Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2015-06-09 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Javier Bermejo; Yolanda Benito; Marta Alhama; Raquel Yotti; Pablo Martínez-Legazpi; Candelas Pérez Del Villar; Esther Pérez-David; Ana González-Mansilla; Cristina Santa-Marta; Alicia Barrio; Francisco Fernández-Avilés; Juan C Del Álamo Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2014-01-10 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Valter Bianchi; Alfonso R Martiniello; Jan Mangual; Vincenzo Tavoletta; Gianni Pedrizzetti; Giovanni Tonti; Valentina Maria Caso; Pio Caso; Antonio D'Onofrio Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2021-01-20 Impact factor: 1.900