Literature DB >> 23664231

Implications for human and environmental health of low doses of ionising radiation.

Carmel Mothersill1, Colin Seymour2.   

Abstract

The last 20 years have seen a major paradigm shift in radiation biology. Several discoveries challenge the DNA centric view which holds that DNA damage is the critical effect of radiation irrespective of dose. This theory leads to the assumption that dose and effect are simply linked - the more energy deposition, the more DNA damage and the greater the biological effect. This is embodied in radiation protection (RP) regulations as the linear-non-threshold (LNT) model. However the science underlying the LNT model is being challenged particularly in relation to the environment because it is now clear that at low doses of concern in RP, cells, tissues and organisms respond to radiation by inducing responses which are not readily predictable by dose. These include adaptive responses, bystander effects, genomic instability and low dose hypersensitivity, and are commonly described as stress responses, while recognizing that "stress" can be good as well as bad. The phenomena contribute to observed radiation responses and appear to be influenced by genetic, epigenetic and environmental factors, meaning that dose and response are not simply related. The question is whether our discovery of these phenomena means that we need to re-evaluate RP approaches. The so-called "non-targeted" mechanisms mean that low dose radiobiology is very complex and supra linear or sub-linear (even hormetic) responses are possible but their occurrence is unpredictable for any given system level. Issues which may need consideration are synergistic or antagonistic effects of other pollutants. RP, at present, only looks at radiation dose but the new (NTE) radiobiology means that chemical or physical agents, which interfere with tissue responses to low doses of radiation, could critically modulate the predicted risk. Similarly, the "health" of the organism could determine the effect of a given low dose by enabling or disabling a critical response. These issues will be discussed.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Low dose radiobiology; Non-human biota; Radiation protection

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23664231     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2013.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Radioact        ISSN: 0265-931X            Impact factor:   2.674


  16 in total

1.  Exposure to low-dose (56)Fe-ion radiation induces long-term epigenetic alterations in mouse bone marrow hematopoietic progenitor and stem cells.

Authors:  Isabelle R Miousse; Lijian Shao; Igor Koturbash; Jianhui Chang; Wei Feng; Yingying Wang; Antiño R Allen; Jennifer Turner; Blair Stewart; Jacob Raber; Daohong Zhou
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Effects of low doses of ionizing radiation exposures on stress-responsive gene expression in human embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Mykyta Sokolov; Ronald Neumann
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Dose and Radioadaptive Response Analysis of Micronucleus Induction in Mouse Bone Marrow.

Authors:  Laura A Bannister; Rebecca R Mantha; Yvonne Devantier; Eugenia S Petoukhov; Chantal L A Brideau; Mandy L Serran; Dmitry Y Klokov
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  On mechanism of antioxidant effect of fullerenols.

Authors:  A S Sachkova; E S Kovel; G N Churilov; O A Guseynov; A A Bondar; I A Dubinina; N S Kudryasheva
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Rep       Date:  2016-11-09

5.  Pre-activation of the genome integrity checkpoint increases DNA damage tolerance.

Authors:  Olga Tsaponina; Andrei Chabes
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Neutron exposures in human cells: bystander effect and relative biological effectiveness.

Authors:  Isheeta Seth; Jeffrey L Schwartz; Robert D Stewart; Robert Emery; Michael C Joiner; James D Tucker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Ischemic heart disease in workers at Mayak PA: latency of incidence risk after radiation exposure.

Authors:  Cristoforo Simonetto; Tamara V Azizova; Evgenia S Grigoryeva; Jan C Kaiser; Helmut Schöllnberger; Markus Eidemüller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Persistent Impact of In utero Irradiation on Mouse Brain Structure and Function Characterized by MR Imaging and Behavioral Analysis.

Authors:  Tine Verreet; Janaki Raman Rangarajan; Roel Quintens; Mieke Verslegers; Adrian C Lo; Kristof Govaerts; Mieke Neefs; Liselotte Leysen; Sarah Baatout; Frederik Maes; Uwe Himmelreich; Rudi D'Hooge; Lieve Moons; Mohammed A Benotmane
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  The clinical effects of low-dose splenic irradiation combined with chest three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy on patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Hongsheng Yu; Yong Qu; Qingjun Shang; Chao Yan; Peng Jiang; Xiang Wang; Donghai Liang; Tao Jiang
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 10.  Heat shock proteins and hormesis in the diagnosis and treatment of neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Sandro Dattilo; Cesare Mancuso; Guido Koverech; Paola Di Mauro; Maria Laura Ontario; Cateno Concetto Petralia; Antonino Petralia; Luigi Maiolino; Agostino Serra; Edward J Calabrese; Vittorio Calabrese
Journal:  Immun Ageing       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 6.400

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.