Literature DB >> 23663857

Comparison of control strategies for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Mary T Bessesen1, Karla Lopez, Karen Guerin, Karen Hendrickson, Shavetta Williams, Susan O'Connor-Wright, Donald Granger, Maureen Bunch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Screening patients for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization and contact precautions for colonized patients has been recommended when other control measures have been ineffective.
METHODS: We compared MRSA transmission rates following implementation of a bundle of control measures that included institutional culture change, surveillance for MRSA infection and transmission, and active screening for colonization in 2 similar Veterans Health Administration hospitals. One hospital employed contact precautions as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the other hospital modified contact precautions, requiring only the use of gloves.
RESULTS: During the 4-year study period, there were 1.58 MRSA transmissions per 1,000 patient-days at hospital A and 1.56 MRSA transmissions per 1,000 patient-days at hospital B (P = .98). Both hospitals experienced significant reductions in MRSA health care-associated infections (HAI). There was no difference between hospital A and hospital B in incidence of MRSA HAIs or MRSA surgical site infections. Annual acquisition costs for cover gowns were $183,609 at hospital A and $25,812 at hospital B.
CONCLUSION: Significant reductions in MRSA HAI were associated with implementation of the MRSA control bundle. The bundle that included full contact precautions for colonized patients was no more effective in prevention of MRSA transmissions than a similar bundle that omitted the use of cover gowns. Published by Mosby, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carrier state; Cross infection; Infection control; Multidrug-resistant organism; Patient isolation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23663857     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2013.01.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Infect Control        ISSN: 0196-6553            Impact factor:   2.918


  1 in total

1.  Development and validation of a time and motion guide to assess the costs of prevention and control interventions for nosocomial infections: A Delphi method among experts.

Authors:  Eric Tchouaket Nguemeleu; Sandra Boivin; Stephanie Robins; Drissa Sia; Kelley Kilpatrick; Sylvain Brousseau; Bruno Dubreuil; Catherine Larouche; Natasha Parisien
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.