Literature DB >> 23663821

Quantitative assessment and determinants of suture-holding capacity of human pancreas.

Orlin Belyaev1, Sonja Rosenkranz, Johanna Munding, Torsten Herzog, Ansgar M Chromik, Andrea Tannapfel, Waldemar Uhl.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hard pancreas is welcome by surgeons performing resective pancreatic surgery, because it is believed to offer better suture holding capacity (SHC), thus decreasing the risk for a postoperative leak. However, neither the actual SHC of pancreatic tissue in humans nor its determinants have been studied.
METHODS: We directly measured SHC for polydioxanone 5-0 suture and tissue hardness at the pancreatic isthmus in 53 human pancreata using a dynamometer and a durometer. A histologic score based on fibrosis grade, fat content, pancreatic duct size, and signs of chronic pancreatitis was calculated for every sample. We tested the hypothesis that SHC of the pancreas was proportional to tissue hardness, and evaluated the role of different possible histomorphologic determinants of SHC.
RESULTS: Suture-holding capacity correlated perfectly with tissue hardness (r = 0.98; P < 0.001; 95% confidence interval, 0.96-0.99). The histologic score showed a stronger correlation with both parameters than any single histologic parameter. The SHC of transductal sutures was significantly higher than that of pure transparenchymal sutures. The SHC and hardness were significantly lower in patients who developed a clinically relevant pancreatic fistula postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: A mixture of histomorphologic features of human pancreas determines its tissue hardness and SHC. Involvement of the main pancreatic duct in the suture line appears to increase the mechanical strength of the pancreatic anastomosis.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Durometer; Dynamometer; Hardness; Histologic score; Pancreas; Pancreatoduodenectomy; Suture-holding capacity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23663821     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.04.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  9 in total

1.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma: surgical results, prognostic factors, and long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Stefano Andrianello; Salvatore Paiella; Valentina Allegrini; Marco Ramera; Alessandra Pulvirenti; Giuseppe Malleo; Roberto Salvia; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 2.  Preoperative imaging evaluation of pancreatic pathologies for the objective prediction of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Yoshitsugu Tajima; Yasunari Kawabata; Noriyuki Hirahara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Over 700 Whipples for Pancreaticobiliary Malignancies: Postoperative Morbidity Is an Additional Negative Prognostic Factor for Distal Bile Duct Cancer.

Authors:  Stefano Andrianello; Giovanni Marchegiani; Giuseppe Malleo; Borislav Chavdarov Rusev; Aldo Scarpa; Deborah Bonamini; Laura Maggino; Claudio Bassi; Roberto Salvia
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Which Suture to Choose in Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery? Assessment of the Influence of Pancreatic Juice and Bile on the Resistance of Suturing Materials-In Vitro Research.

Authors:  Marcin Gierek; Katarzyna Merkel; Gabriela Ochała-Gierek; Paweł Niemiec; Karol Szyluk; Katarzyna Kuśnierz
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-05-02

5.  A simple pancreaticojejunostomy technique for hard pancreases using only two transpancreatic sutures with buttresses: a comparison with the previous pancreaticogastrostomy and dunking methods.

Authors:  Eun Young Kim; Young Kyoung You; Dong Goo Kim; Tae Ho Hong
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 1.859

6.  Quantitative assessment of liver fibrosis using shore durometer.

Authors:  Young Chul Yoon; Jun Suh Lee; Sang Uk Park; Jung Hyun Kwon; Tae Ho Hong; Dong Goo Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 1.859

7.  Pancreatic hardness: Correlation of surgeon's palpation, durometer measurement and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging features.

Authors:  Tae Ho Hong; Joon-Il Choi; Michael Yong Park; Sung Eun Rha; Young Joon Lee; Young Kyoung You; Moon Hyung Choi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Protocol of a prospective study investigating the association of PAncreatic parenchymal RISk factors with postoperative pancreatic fistula after partial pancreaticoduodenectomy (PARIS trial).

Authors:  Fabian Schuh; Matthias A Fink; Manuel Feisst; Christoph Eckert; Colette Dörr-Harim; Phillip Knebel; Markus K Diener; Markus W Büchler; André L Mihaljevic; Pascal Probst
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 3.006

9.  A Novel Way of Preventing Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula by Directly Injecting Profibrogenic Materials into the Pancreatic Parenchyma.

Authors:  Sang Chul Lee; Tae Ho Hong; Ok-Hee Kim; Suk Joon Cho; Kee-Hwan Kim; Jin Sook Song; Kyu-Seok Hwang; Jae-Kyung Jung; Ha-Eun Hong; Haeyeon Seo; Ho Joong Choi; Joseph Ahn; Tae Yoon Lee; Eunyoung Rim; Kwan-Young Jung; Say-June Kim
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 5.923

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.