Literature DB >> 23663799

Acute low back usually resolves quickly but persistent low back pain often persists.

Ingrid Heuch1, Ida Stange Foss.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the evidence of clinical course of pain and disability in patients with acute and persistent low-back pain, and to investigate whether pain and disability had similar courses. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, CINAHL and Embase databases were searched from 1950 to November, 2011. This search was supplemented by searching of reference lists from eligible studies. STUDY SELECTION: Inception cohort studies involving patients with acute (< 6 weeks) and persistent (≥ 6 weeks) low-back pain in which pain or disability outcomes were reported. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers extracted data and discrepancies were resolved by consulting a third reviewer. Methodological quality was assessed using 5 criteria suggested by Altman (2001). A meta-analysis of pain and disability outcome data was conducted, in which pain and disability were modelled as a function of time. DATA SYNTHESIS: Of 28 613 studies initially identified by the search, 43 studies (33 cohorts) with a total of 11 166 patients met the selection criteria. Data quality was insufficient in many of the studies; only 52% of the studies explicitly reported methods for assembling a representative sample, 73% had a follow-up of at least 80%, and 88% had a follow-up for at least one prognosis outcome at three months or longer. Based on the quantitative pooling of 24 cohorts and 4994 patients the variance-weighted mean pain score (0-100) was 52 (95% CI 48 to 57) at baseline, 23 (95% CI 21 to 25) at 6 weeks, 12 (95% CI 9 to 15) at 26 weeks, and 6 (95% CI 3 to 10) at 52 weeks after the onset of pain for cohorts with acute pain. Among cohorts with persistent pain, the variance-weighted mean pain score (out of 100) was 51 (95% CI 44 to 59) at baseline, 33 (95% CI 29 to 38) at 6 weeks, 26 (95% CI 20 to 33) at 26 weeks, and 23 (95% CI 16 to 30) at 52 weeks after the onset of pain. The course of disability outcomes was similar to the time course of pain outcomes in the acute pain cohorts, but for persistent pain cohorts disability only improved slowly, despite substantial initial improvement in pain. There were large within-study and between-study variation in outcomes.
CONCLUSION: Most people who seek care for acute or persistent low-back pain improved markedly within the first six weeks, but afterwards improvement slowed. Low to moderate levels of pain and disability were still present at one year, especially in people with persistent pain.
Copyright © 2013 Australian Physiotherapy Association. Published by .. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23663799     DOI: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70166-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiother        ISSN: 1836-9561            Impact factor:   7.000


  6 in total

1.  Recommendations for management of low-back pain misleading.

Authors:  Sean A Kennedy; Mark O Baerlocher
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Low Back Pain, a Comprehensive Review: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment.

Authors:  Ivan Urits; Aaron Burshtein; Medha Sharma; Lauren Testa; Peter A Gold; Vwaire Orhurhu; Omar Viswanath; Mark R Jones; Moises A Sidransky; Boris Spektor; Alan D Kaye
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2019-03-11

Review 3.  Stem Cell Therapies for Treatment of Discogenic Low Back Pain: a Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Ivan Urits; Alexander Capuco; Medha Sharma; Alan D Kaye; Omar Viswanath; Elyse M Cornett; Vwaire Orhurhu
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2019-07-29

4.  Classification of patients with incident non-specific low back pain: implications for research.

Authors:  Giulia Norton; Christine M McDonough; Howard J Cabral; Michael Shwartz; James F Burgess
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 4.166

5.  Socio-Cultural Factors and Experience of Chronic Low Back Pain: a Spanish and Brazilian Patients' Perspective. A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Daiana Priscila Rodrigues-de-Souza; Domingo Palacios-Ceña; Lourdes Moro-Gutiérrez; Paula Rezende Camargo; Tania Fátima Salvini; Francisco Alburquerque-Sendín
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Prevalence of low back pain in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jean Théroux; Norman Stomski; Christopher J Hodgetts; Ariane Ballard; Christelle Khadra; Sylvie Le May; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2017-04-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.