Literature DB >> 23663250

Haplotype analysis of sucrose synthase gene family in three Saccharum species.

Jisen Zhang1, Jie Arro, Youqiang Chen, Ray Ming.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sugarcane is an economically important crop contributing about 80% and 40% to the world sugar and ethanol production, respectively. The complicated genetics consequential to its complex polyploid genome, however, have impeded efforts to improve sugar yield and related important agronomic traits. Modern sugarcane cultivars are complex hybrids derived mainly from crosses among its progenitor species, S. officinarum and S. spontanuem, and to a lesser degree, S. robustom. Atypical of higher plants, sugarcane stores its photoassimilates as sucrose rather than as starch in its parenchymous stalk cells. In the sugar biosynthesis pathway, sucrose synthase (SuSy, UDP-glucose: D-fructose 2-a-D-glucosyltransferase, EC 2.4.1.13) is a key enzyme in the regulation of sucrose accumulation and partitioning by catalyzing the reversible conversion of sucrose and UDP into UDP-glucose and fructose. However, little is known about the sugarcane SuSy gene family members and hence no definitive studies have been reported regarding allelic diversity of SuSy gene families in Saccharum species.
RESULTS: We identified and characterized a total of five sucrose synthase genes in the three sugarcane progenitor species through gene annotation and PCR haplotype analysis by analyzing 70 to 119 PCR fragments amplified from intron-containing target regions. We detected all but one (i.e. ScSuSy5) of ScSuSy transcripts in five tissue types of three Saccharum species. The average SNP frequency was one SNP per 108 bp, 81 bp, and 72 bp in S. officinarum, S. robustom, and S. spontanuem respectively. The average shared SNP is 15 between S. officinarum and S. robustom, 7 between S. officinarum and S. spontanuem , and 11 between S. robustom and S. spontanuem. We identified 27, 35, and 32 haplotypes from the five ScSuSy genes in S. officinarum, S. robustom, and S. spontanuem respectively. Also, 12, 11, and 9 protein sequences were translated from the haplotypes in S. officinarum, S. robustom, S. spontanuem, respectively. Phylogenetic analysis showed three separate clusters composed of SbSuSy1 and SbSuSy2, SbSuSy3 and SbSuSy5, and SbSuSy4.
CONCLUSIONS: The five members of the SuSy gene family evolved before the divergence of the genera in the tribe Andropogoneae at least 12 MYA. Each ScSuSy gene showed at least one non-synonymous substitution in SNP haplotypes. The SNP frequency is the lowest in S. officinarum, intermediate in S. robustum, and the highest in S. spontaneum, which may reflect the timing of the two rounds of whole genome duplication in these octoploids. The higher rate of shared SNP frequency between S. officinarum and S. robustum than between S. officinarum and in S. spontaneum confirmed that the speciation event separating S. officinarum and S. robustum occurred after their common ancestor diverged from S. spontaneum. The SNP and haplotype frequencies in three Saccharum species provide fundamental information for designing strategies to sequence these autopolyploid genomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23663250      PMCID: PMC3668173          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Genomics        ISSN: 1471-2164            Impact factor:   3.969


  30 in total

1.  High homologous gene conservation despite extreme autopolyploid redundancy in sugarcane.

Authors:  Olivier Garsmeur; Carine Charron; Stéphanie Bocs; Vincent Jouffe; Sylvie Samain; Arnaud Couloux; Gaëtan Droc; Cyrille Zini; Jean-Christophe Glaszmann; Marie-Anne Van Sluys; Angélique D'Hont
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 10.151

2.  PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood.

Authors:  Ziheng Yang
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Purifying selection modulates the estimates of population differentiation and confounds genome-wide comparisons across single-nucleotide polymorphisms.

Authors:  Takahiro Maruki; Sudhir Kumar; Yuseob Kim
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  The three maize sucrose synthase isoforms differ in distribution, localization, and phosphorylation.

Authors:  Kateri A Duncan; Shane C Hardin; Steven C Huber
Journal:  Plant Cell Physiol       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 4.927

5.  The Sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses.

Authors:  Andrew H Paterson; John E Bowers; Rémy Bruggmann; Inna Dubchak; Jane Grimwood; Heidrun Gundlach; Georg Haberer; Uffe Hellsten; Therese Mitros; Alexander Poliakov; Jeremy Schmutz; Manuel Spannagl; Haibao Tang; Xiyin Wang; Thomas Wicker; Arvind K Bharti; Jarrod Chapman; F Alex Feltus; Udo Gowik; Igor V Grigoriev; Eric Lyons; Christopher A Maher; Mihaela Martis; Apurva Narechania; Robert P Otillar; Bryan W Penning; Asaf A Salamov; Yu Wang; Lifang Zhang; Nicholas C Carpita; Michael Freeling; Alan R Gingle; C Thomas Hash; Beat Keller; Patricia Klein; Stephen Kresovich; Maureen C McCann; Ray Ming; Daniel G Peterson; Doreen Ware; Peter Westhoff; Klaus F X Mayer; Joachim Messing; Daniel S Rokhsar
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Tablet--next generation sequence assembly visualization.

Authors:  Iain Milne; Micha Bayer; Linda Cardle; Paul Shaw; Gordon Stephen; Frank Wright; David Marshall
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Targeted single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) discovery in a highly polyploid plant species using 454 sequencing.

Authors:  Peter C Bundock; Frances G Eliott; Gary Ablett; Adam D Benson; Rosanne E Casu; Karen S Aitken; Robert J Henry
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 9.803

8.  A cladistic analysis of phenotype associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping. II. The analysis of natural populations.

Authors:  A R Templeton; C F Sing; A Kessling; S Humphries
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Characterisation of the double genome structure of modern sugarcane cultivars (Saccharum spp.) by molecular cytogenetics.

Authors:  A D'Hont; L Grivet; P Feldmann; S Rao; N Berding; J C Glaszmann
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1996-03-07

10.  Orthologous comparison in a gene-rich region among grasses reveals stability in the sugarcane polyploid genome.

Authors:  Nazeema Jannoo; Laurent Grivet; Nathalie Chantret; Olivier Garsmeur; Jean Christophe Glaszmann; Paulo Arruda; Angélique D'Hont
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2007-04-08       Impact factor: 6.417

View more
  19 in total

1.  New insights into the evolution and functional divergence of the SWEET family in Saccharum based on comparative genomics.

Authors:  Weichang Hu; Xiuting Hua; Qing Zhang; Jianping Wang; Qiaochu Shen; Xingtan Zhang; Kai Wang; Qingyi Yu; Yann-Rong Lin; Ray Ming; Jisen Zhang
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 4.215

2.  Sugarcane genome sequencing by methylation filtration provides tools for genomic research in the genus Saccharum.

Authors:  Clícia Grativol; Michael Regulski; Marcelo Bertalan; W Richard McCombie; Felipe Rodrigues da Silva; Adhemar Zerlotini Neto; Renato Vicentini; Laurent Farinelli; Adriana Silva Hemerly; Robert A Martienssen; Paulo Cavalcanti Gomes Ferreira
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 6.417

3.  Gene structure, phylogeny and expression profile of the sucrose synthase gene family in cacao (Theobroma cacao L.).

Authors:  Fupeng Li; Chaoyun Hao; Lin Yan; Baoduo Wu; Xiaowei Qin; Jianxiong Lai; Yinghui Song
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.166

4.  Molecular cloning, structure, phylogeny and expression analysis of the invertase gene family in sugarcane.

Authors:  Liming Wang; Yuexia Zheng; Shihui Ding; Qing Zhang; Youqiang Chen; Jisen Zhang
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 4.215

5.  Genome-wide identification and expression profiling of DREB genes in Saccharum spontaneum.

Authors:  Zhen Li; Gang Wang; Xihui Liu; Zhengchao Wang; Muqing Zhang; Jisen Zhang
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Full-length enriched cDNA libraries and ORFeome analysis of sugarcane hybrid and ancestor genotypes.

Authors:  Milton Yutaka Nishiyama; Savio Siqueira Ferreira; Pei-Zhong Tang; Scott Becker; Antje Pörtner-Taliana; Glaucia Mendes Souza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Natural Allelic Variations in Highly Polyploidy Saccharum Complex.

Authors:  Jian Song; Xiping Yang; Marcio F R Resende; Leandro G Neves; James Todd; Jisen Zhang; Jack C Comstock; Jianping Wang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Co-expression network analysis reveals transcription factors associated to cell wall biosynthesis in sugarcane.

Authors:  Savio Siqueira Ferreira; Carlos Takeshi Hotta; Viviane Guzzo de Carli Poelking; Debora Chaves Coelho Leite; Marcos Silveira Buckeridge; Marcelo Ehlers Loureiro; Marcio Henrique Pereira Barbosa; Monalisa Sampaio Carneiro; Glaucia Mendes Souza
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 4.076

9.  Transcript Analysis and Regulative Events during Flower Development in Olive (Olea europaea L.).

Authors:  Fiammetta Alagna; Marco Cirilli; Giulio Galla; Fabrizio Carbone; Loretta Daddiego; Paolo Facella; Loredana Lopez; Chiara Colao; Roberto Mariotti; Nicolò Cultrera; Martina Rossi; Gianni Barcaccia; Luciana Baldoni; Rosario Muleo; Gaetano Perrotta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Structure, phylogeny, allelic haplotypes and expression of sucrose transporter gene families in Saccharum.

Authors:  Qing Zhang; Weichang Hu; Fan Zhu; Liming Wang; Qingyi Yu; Ray Ming; Jisen Zhang
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.