Literature DB >> 23663175

Spatial transposition gradients in visual working memory.

Laura Rerko1, Klaus Oberauer, Hsuan-Yu Lin.   

Abstract

In list memory, access to individual items reflects limits of temporal distinctiveness. This is reflected in the finding that neighbouring list items tend to be confused most often. This article investigates the analogous effect of spatial proximity in a visual working-memory task. Items were presented in different locations varying in spatial distance. A retro-cue indicated the location of the item relevant for the subsequent memory test. In two recognition experiments, probes matching spatially close neighbours of the relevant item led to more false alarms than probes matching distant neighbours or non-neighbouring memory items. In two probed-recall experiments, one with simultaneous, the other with sequential memory item presentation, items closer to the cued location were more frequently chosen for recall than more distant items. These results reflect a spatial transposition gradient analogous to the temporal transposition gradient in serial recall and challenge fixed-capacity models of visual working memory (WM).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23663175     DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2013.789543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  11 in total

1.  The precision of spatial selection into the focus of attention in working memory.

Authors:  Alessandra S Souza; Mirko Thalmann; Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

2.  Evaluating and excluding swap errors in analogue tests of working memory.

Authors:  Paul M Bays
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Neural Architecture for Feature Binding in Visual Working Memory.

Authors:  Sebastian Schneegans; Paul M Bays
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Failure of self-consistency in the discrete resource model of visual working memory.

Authors:  Paul M Bays
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2018-06-03       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Internal but not external noise frees working memory resources.

Authors:  Ivan Tomić; Paul M Bays
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  The Graded Fate of Unattended Stimulus Representations in Visuospatial Working Memory.

Authors:  Muhammet I Sahan; Edwin S Dalmaijer; Tom Verguts; Masud Husain; Wim Fias
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-02-26

Review 7.  Systematic Review of the Longitudinal Sensitivity of Precision Tasks in Visual Working Memory.

Authors:  James Ades; Jyoti Mishra
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-21

8.  The objects of visuospatial short-term memory: Perceptual organization and change detection.

Authors:  Atanaska Nikolova; Bill Macken
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  No fixed item limit in visuospatial working memory.

Authors:  Sebastian Schneegans; Paul M Bays
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  Theory of neural coding predicts an upper bound on estimates of memory variability.

Authors:  Robert Taylor; Paul M Bays
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 8.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.