Literature DB >> 23663088

Success rates of prosthetic restorations on endodontically treated teeth; a systematic review after 6 years.

A Ploumaki1, A Bilkhair, T Tuna, S Stampf, J R Strub.   

Abstract

The aims of this systematic review were to investigate the success rates of prosthetic restorations on endodontically treated teeth and their manner of failure. PubMed and hand literature searches were conducted on studies published until June 2012. Only clinical studies on human subjects referring to the success rates of prosthetic restorations on endodontically treated teeth with a follow-up period of at least 6 years were reviewed. A total of four studies were identified. Meta-analysis showed the success rate to be 92% (CI 82-98%) for single crowns on endodontically treated teeth and 79% (72-86%) for fixed dental prostheses. Only one study reported on removable dental prostheses with a success rate of 66%. Single crowns on teeth restored without posts demonstrated a success rate of 94% (CI 84-99%), whereas where posts were placed, the success rate was lower (92% CI 82-98%). Single crowns over cast post-and-cores and prefabricated posts showed success rates of 93% (CI 82-99%) and 94% (CI 90-97%), respectively; both differences were not statistically significant (significance level of 5%). The most common reason for failure was post-debonding. Single crowns seem to be the best treatment modality for endodontically treated teeth. However, due to the low number of studies included and their design, the results of this systematic review should be interpreted with caution. Further clinical studies are needed to provide high-quality evidence on the topic.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  crowns; endodontically treated teeth; fixed and removable dental prostheses; posts; success rates

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23663088     DOI: 10.1111/joor.12058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN: 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  7 in total

Review 1.  Treatment planning the endodontic-implant interface.

Authors:  W P Saunders
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Clinical and histological reaction of periodontal tissues to subgingival resin composite restorations.

Authors:  Carlo Bertoldi; Emanuela Monari; Pierpaolo Cortellini; Luigi Generali; Andrea Lucchi; Sergio Spinato; Davide Zaffe
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  In vitro assessment of retention and resistance failure loads of complete coverage restorations made for anterior maxillary teeth restored with two different cast post and core designs.

Authors:  Efpraxia Bakirtzoglou; Savvas N Kamalakidis; Argirios L Pissiotis; Konstantinos Michalakis
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2019-03-01

Review 4.  An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Evaluating the Success Rate of Prosthetic Restorations on Endodontically Treated Teeth.

Authors:  Amirhossein Fathi; Behnaz Ebadian; Sara Nasrollahi Dezaki; Nahal Mardasi; Ramin Mosharraf; Sabire Isler; Shiva Sadat Tabatabaei
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2022-02-22

5.  Endocrown with Leucite-Reinforced Ceramic: Case of Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth.

Authors:  Leonardo Fernandes da Cunha; José Mondelli; Caroline Moreira Auersvald; Carla Castiglia Gonzaga; Rafael Francisco Lia Mondelli; Gisele Maria Correr; Adilson Yoshio Furuse
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2015-10-18

6.  Endocrown: An Alternative Approach for Restoring Endodontically Treated Molars with Large Coronal Destruction.

Authors:  Houda Dogui; Feriel Abdelmalek; Adel Amor; Nabiha Douki
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2018-08-30

7.  Unexpected Complication Ten Years after Initial Treatment: Long-Term Report and Fate of a Maxillary Premolar Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Davide Augusti; Gabriele Augusti
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2018-09-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.