Literature DB >> 23662861

Objects and categories: feature statistics and object processing in the ventral stream.

Lorraine K Tyler1, Shannon Chiu, Jie Zhuang, Billi Randall, Barry J Devereux, Paul Wright, Alex Clarke, Kirsten I Taylor.   

Abstract

Recognizing an object involves more than just visual analyses; its meaning must also be decoded. Extensive research has shown that processing the visual properties of objects relies on a hierarchically organized stream in ventral occipitotemporal cortex, with increasingly more complex visual features being coded from posterior to anterior sites culminating in the perirhinal cortex (PRC) in the anteromedial temporal lobe (aMTL). The neurobiological principles of the conceptual analysis of objects remain more controversial. Much research has focused on two neural regions-the fusiform gyrus and aMTL, both of which show semantic category differences, but of different types. fMRI studies show category differentiation in the fusiform gyrus, based on clusters of semantically similar objects, whereas category-specific deficits, specifically for living things, are associated with damage to the aMTL. These category-specific deficits for living things have been attributed to problems in differentiating between highly similar objects, a process that involves the PRC. To determine whether the PRC and the fusiform gyri contribute to different aspects of an object's meaning, with differentiation between confusable objects in the PRC and categorization based on object similarity in the fusiform, we carried out an fMRI study of object processing based on a feature-based model that characterizes the degree of semantic similarity and difference between objects and object categories. Participants saw 388 objects for which feature statistic information was available and named the objects at the basic level while undergoing fMRI scanning. After controlling for the effects of visual information, we found that feature statistics that capture similarity between objects formed category clusters in fusiform gyri, such that objects with many shared features (typical of living things) were associated with activity in the lateral fusiform gyri whereas objects with fewer shared features (typical of nonliving things) were associated with activity in the medial fusiform gyri. Significantly, a feature statistic reflecting differentiation between highly similar objects, enabling object-specific representations, was associated with bilateral PRC activity. These results confirm that the statistical characteristics of conceptual object features are coded in the ventral stream, supporting a conceptual feature-based hierarchy, and integrating disparate findings of category responses in fusiform gyri and category deficits in aMTL into a unifying neurocognitive framework.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23662861      PMCID: PMC3767967          DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  52 in total

1.  Perceptual-mnemonic functions of the perirhinal cortex.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Processing objects at different levels of specificity.

Authors:  L K Tyler; E A Stamatakis; P Bright; K Acres; S Abdallah; J M Rodd; H E Moss
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 3.  Connectionist approaches to understanding aphasic perseveration.

Authors:  Stephen J Gotts; David C Plaut
Journal:  Semin Speech Lang       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.761

4.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation.

Authors:  K K Kwong; J W Belliveau; D A Chesler; I E Goldberg; R M Weisskoff; B P Poncelet; D N Kennedy; B E Hoppel; M S Cohen; R Turner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  How long to scan? The relationship between fMRI temporal signal to noise ratio and necessary scan duration.

Authors:  Kevin Murphy; Jerzy Bodurka; Peter A Bandettini
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Attractor dynamics and semantic neighborhood density: processing is slowed by near neighbors and speeded by distant neighbors.

Authors:  Daniel Mirman; James S Magnuson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning.

Authors:  K McRae; V R de Sa; M S Seidenberg
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1997-06

8.  Shared Features Dominate Semantic Richness Effects for Concrete Concepts.

Authors:  Ray Grondin; Stephen J Lupker; Ken McRae
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.059

9.  Identifying natural images from human brain activity.

Authors:  Kendrick N Kay; Thomas Naselaris; Ryan J Prenger; Jack L Gallant
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  From perception to conception: how meaningful objects are processed over time.

Authors:  Alex Clarke; Kirsten I Taylor; Barry Devereux; Billi Randall; Lorraine K Tyler
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  37 in total

1.  Neural microgenesis of personally familiar face recognition.

Authors:  Meike Ramon; Luca Vizioli; Joan Liu-Shuang; Bruno Rossion
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Similarity of fMRI activity patterns in left perirhinal cortex reflects semantic similarity between words.

Authors:  Rose Bruffaerts; Patrick Dupont; Ronald Peeters; Simon De Deyne; Gerrit Storms; Rik Vandenberghe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Medial temporal and neocortical contributions to remote memory for semantic narratives: evidence from amnesia.

Authors:  Mieke Verfaellie; Kathryn Bousquet; Margaret M Keane
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Semantic interference and its control: A functional neuroimaging and connectivity study.

Authors:  Matteo Canini; Pasquale Anthony Della Rosa; Eleonora Catricalà; Kristof Strijkers; Francesca Martina Branzi; Albert Costa; Jubin Abutalebi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Activity reductions in perirhinal cortex predict conceptual priming and familiarity-based recognition.

Authors:  Wei-Chun Wang; Charan Ranganath; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  A Chinese Conceptual Semantic Feature Dataset (CCFD).

Authors:  Yaling Deng; Ye Wang; Chenyang Qiu; Zhenchao Hu; Wenyang Sun; Yanzhu Gong; Xue Zhao; Wei He; Lihong Cao
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-02-02

7.  Two areas for familiar face recognition in the primate brain.

Authors:  Sofia M Landi; Winrich A Freiwald
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Intrinsic functional connectivity of the central nucleus of the amygdala and bed nucleus of the stria terminalis.

Authors:  Adam X Gorka; Salvatore Torrisi; Alexander J Shackman; Christian Grillon; Monique Ernst
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Increased neural activity during overt and continuous semantic verbal fluency in major depression: mainly a failure to deactivate.

Authors:  Heidelore Backes; Bruno Dietsche; Arne Nagels; Mirjam Stratmann; Carsten Konrad; Tilo Kircher; Axel Krug
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 5.270

10.  Does the sound of a barking dog activate its corresponding visual form? An fMRI investigation of modality-specific semantic access.

Authors:  Jamie Reilly; Amanda Garcia; Richard J Binney
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 2.381

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.