Literature DB >> 23662746

Improving knowledge about prenatal screening options: can group education make a difference?

Dana M Knutzen1, Katie A Stoll, Michael W McClellan, Shad H Deering, Lisa M Foglia.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the addition of group education regarding maternal serum screening and diagnostic testing for aneuploidy and neural tube defects improves patient knowledge and affects the uptake of testing compared to individual education alone.
METHOD: We conducted a prospective study of 443 obstetric patients to assess knowledge of prenatal testing options based on individual provider counseling (n = 331) or provider counseling with supplemental group education (n = 112). We used a chi-square test to compare the number of correct survey answers between the two groups.
RESULTS: There was no difference in baseline knowledge. Patients receiving group education showed a statistically significant improvement in knowledge. After initiation of group education, the uptake of maternal serum screening declined while the uptake of amniocentesis remained unchanged.
CONCLUSION: Group education in addition to individual counseling to discuss prenatal testing options appears to be effective in improving knowledge compared to individual provider counseling alone. Improved knowledge may affect uptake of prenatal screening tests due to more informed decision making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23662746     DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2013.804504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med        ISSN: 1476-4954


  5 in total

1.  Implementing Group Prenatal Counseling for Expanded Noninvasive Screening Options.

Authors:  Betsy L Gammon; Laura Otto; Myra Wick; Kristy Borowski; Megan Allyse
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  Pre- and post-test genetic counseling for chromosomal and Mendelian disorders.

Authors:  Jill Fonda Allen; Katie Stoll; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.300

3.  Spanish- and English-Speaking Pregnant Women's Views on cfDNA and Other Prenatal Screening: Practical and Ethical Reflections.

Authors:  Erin Floyd; Megan A Allyse; Marsha Michie
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Attitude, knowledge and informed choice towards prenatal screening for Down Syndrome: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Melania Elena Pop-Tudose; Dana Popescu-Spineni; Petru Armean; Ioan Victor Pop
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Psychological outcomes, knowledge and preferences of pregnant women on first-trimester screening for fetal structural abnormalities: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Francesca Bardi; Merel Bakker; Monique J A Kenkhuis; Adelita V Ranchor; Marian K Bakker; Ayten Elvan; Erwin Birnie; Caterina M Bilardo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.