Literature DB >> 2366237

An obstructed death and medical ethics.

S Dunbar1.   

Abstract

In this case analysis deception or lying to a dying patient is discussed within the context of different relationships: the relationship between the patient and her family doctor, the relationship between the patient and the surgeon and the relationship between the patient and her family. It is suggested that the principle of veracity is not only a core feature in the patient-doctor relationship but is also fundamentally connected with the basic element of trust between the patient and doctor. The surgeon, in deceiving the patient, even at the request of her husband, betrayed her trust in violating the principle of veracity. The primary responsibility of the surgeon was towards his patient rather than her family. In lying to his patient the surgeon failed to give Mrs Fasper something she needed most: respect for her as a person.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Death and Euthanasia; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2366237      PMCID: PMC1375935          DOI: 10.1136/jme.16.2.83

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  1 in total

1.  Truth at the last--a case of obstructed death?

Authors:  R Higgs
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 2.903

  1 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Rethinking autonomy: decision making between patient and surgeon in advanced illnesses.

Authors:  Lauren M Wancata; Daniel B Hinshaw
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.