| Literature DB >> 23662156 |
Krishna Dalal1, D Elanchezhiyan, Raunak Das, Devjyoti Dalal, Ravindra Mohan Pandey, Subhamoy Chatterjee, Ashish Datt Upadhyay, V Bharathi Maran, Jyotirmoy Chatterjee.
Abstract
Objective. When exploring the scientific basis of reflexology techniques, elucidation of the surface and subsurface features of reflexology areas (RAs) is crucial. In this study, the subcutaneous features of RAs related to the lumbar vertebrae were evaluated by swept source-optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) in subjects with and without low back pain (LBP). Methods. Volunteers without LBP (n = 6 (male : female = 1 : 1)) and subjects with LBP (n = 15 (male : female = 2 : 3)) were clinically examined in terms of skin colour (visual perception), localised tenderness (visual analogue scale) and structural as well as optical attributes as per SS-OCT. From each subject, 6 optical tomograms were recorded from equidistant transverse planes along the longitudinal axis of the RAs, and from each tomogram, 25 different spatial locations were considered for recording SS-OCT image attributes. The images were analysed with respect to the optical intensity distributions and thicknesses of different skin layers by using AxioVision Rel. 4.8.2 software. The SS-OCT images could be categorised into 4 pathological grades (i.e., 0, 1, 2, and 3) according to distinctness in the visible skin layers. Results. Three specific grades for abnormalities in SS-OCT images were identified considering gradual loss of distinctness and increase in luminosity of skin layers. Almost 90.05% subjects were of mixed type having predominance in certain grades. Conclusion. The skin SS-OCT system demonstrated a definite association of the surface features of healthy/unhealthy RAs with cutaneous features and the clinical status of the lumbar vertebrae.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23662156 PMCID: PMC3608122 DOI: 10.1155/2013/983769
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1The medial view of lumbar vertebrae reflexology area “abcd” where ab = cd = 3 cm; ad = cb = 1 cm. Each of A, B, C, and D is the reference point for this reflexology area, where the line CD is perpendicular to “AB”. A: tip of big toe; B: midpoint of posterior surface of calcaneum; C: anterior border of medial malleolus; D: 1.5 cm below Sustentaculum tali. E is the perpendicular bisector of “ad” and F is that of “bc”.
Figure 2A scheme of data collection on the luminosity of the different layers of the cutaneous skin related to the reflexology area of lumbar vertebrae.
Figure 3A demonstration of the method for collecting image data records. The SS-OCT image frame consists of 25 equidistant vertical line segments within the viable epidermis. Each line represents the depth of the viable epidermis (in pixels) at a particular location.
Optical and SS-OCT images of lumbar reflexology areas and corresponding pain history.
|
|
The depth of subcutaneous layer for which SS-OCT images were captured was 1.75 mm.
*Tenderness was observed in response to finger pressure (FP) (30 N/cm2 < FP < 35 N cm2).
**Tenderness without pigmentation n% = 41%; tenderness with pigmentation n% = 59%; pigmentation without tenderness n% = 0; P < 0.05.
SS-OCT feature-based pathological grades of lumbar reflexology areas: grade 0: normal RAs; grade 1 RAs: early degenerative changes in SS-OCT images; grade 2 RAs: moderately advanced changes in SS-OCT images; grade 3 RAs: advanced changes in SS-OCT images.
Figure 4The skin SS-OCT images of lumbar reflexology areas under different pathological conditions: (a) grade 0 (normal); (b) grade 1 (early degeneration); (c) grade 2 (moderate degeneration); (d) grade 3 (severe degeneration). a: stratum corneum; b: viable epidermis; c: basal membrane; d: papillary dermis; e: reticular dermis; f: dermal papillae; g: rete pegs; h: sweat glands; i: macrovessels.
Figure 5The graphical variations of the luminosity of cutaneous layers under the different grades of the degenerations of the RAs.
Comparison of the depth of viable epidermis.
| Grade | Gender |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | ||||
| Sample size of image data ( | Depth of viable epidermis ( | Sample size of image data ( | Depth of viable epidermis ( | ||
| Grade 0 | 300 | 942 | 325 | 575 | 0.001 |
| Grade 1 | 250 | 820 | 500 | 532 | 0.001 |
| Grade 2 | 450 | 602 | 650 | 397 | 0.001 |
| Grade 3 | 275 | 242 | 400 | 259 | 0.248 |
| Overall | 0.001 | 0.001 | |||
| Post hoc multiple grade comparison | |||||
| 0 versus 1 | 0.001 | 0.001 | |||
| 0 versus 2 | 0.001 | 0.001 | |||
| 0 versus 3 | 0.001 | 0.001 | |||
| 1 versus 2 | 0.001 | 0.001 | |||
| 1 versus 3 | 0.001 | 0.001 | |||
| 2 versus 3 | 0.001 | 0.001 | |||
†Values are expressed as median (minimum–maximum).
Comparison of the thickness of stratum corneum.
| Grade | Gender |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | ||||
| Sample size of image data ( | Thickness of stratum corneum ( | Sample size of image data ( | Thickness of stratum corneum ( | ||
| Grade 0 | 300 | 44.8 | 325 | 41.7 | 0.001 |
| Grade 1 | 250 | 44.2 | 500 | 40.0 | 0.001 |
| Grade 2 | 450 | 35.2 | 650 | 25.7 | 0.009 |
| Grade 3 | 275 | 18.5 | 400 | 11.2 | 0.023 |
| Overall | 0.001 | 0.001 | |||
| Post hoc multiple grade comparison | |||||
| 0 versus 1 | 0.363 | 0.679 | |||
| 0 versus 2 | 0.003 | 0.001 | |||
| 0 versus 3 | 0.001 | 0.001 | |||
| 1 versus 2 | 0.109 | 0.001 | |||
| 1 versus 3 | 0.004 | 0.001 | |||
| 2 versus 3 | 0.008 | 0.001 | |||
†Values are expressed as median (minimum–maximum).