CONTEXT: Cross-sectional studies of the signs and symptoms of psychosis yield dimensional phenotypes. However, the validity and clinical utility of such dimensions remain debated. This study investigated the structure of psychotic symptomatology, the stability of the structure over time, and the concordance between symptom dimensions and categorical diagnoses. METHODS: Sample consisted of 500 first-episode psychotic patients. A cross-sectional study (N = 500) investigated the organizational structure of symptom dimensions at the onset of psychosis and its concordance with categorical diagnoses; next, a nested longitudinal study (N = 100) examined the stability of the symptom dimensions structure after 5-10 years of follow-up. RESULTS: Factor analyses identified 6 first-order factors (mania, negative, disorganization, depression, hallucinations, and delusions) and 2 high-order factors (affective and nonaffective psychoses). Cumulative variance accounted for by the first and high-order factors was 63%: 31% by the first-order factors and 32% by the high-order factors. The factorial structure of psychotic symptoms during first episode remained stable after 5-10 years of follow-up. The overall concordance between 4 categorical diagnostic groups (schizophrenia, mania with psychosis, psychotic depression and schizoaffective disorder) and dimensional symptom ranged from 62.2% to 73.1% (when the schizoaffective group was excluded). CONCLUSIONS: Symptoms of psychosis assume a multidimensional hierarchical structure. This hierarchical model was stable over time and showed good concordance with categorical diagnoses. The combined use of dimensional and categorical approach to psychotic disorders would be of clinical and research utility.
CONTEXT: Cross-sectional studies of the signs and symptoms of psychosis yield dimensional phenotypes. However, the validity and clinical utility of such dimensions remain debated. This study investigated the structure of psychotic symptomatology, the stability of the structure over time, and the concordance between symptom dimensions and categorical diagnoses. METHODS: Sample consisted of 500 first-episode psychotic patients. A cross-sectional study (N = 500) investigated the organizational structure of symptom dimensions at the onset of psychosis and its concordance with categorical diagnoses; next, a nested longitudinal study (N = 100) examined the stability of the symptom dimensions structure after 5-10 years of follow-up. RESULTS: Factor analyses identified 6 first-order factors (mania, negative, disorganization, depression, hallucinations, and delusions) and 2 high-order factors (affective and nonaffective psychoses). Cumulative variance accounted for by the first and high-order factors was 63%: 31% by the first-order factors and 32% by the high-order factors. The factorial structure of psychotic symptoms during first episode remained stable after 5-10 years of follow-up. The overall concordance between 4 categorical diagnostic groups (schizophrenia, mania with psychosis, psychotic depression and schizoaffective disorder) and dimensional symptom ranged from 62.2% to 73.1% (when the schizoaffective group was excluded). CONCLUSIONS: Symptoms of psychosis assume a multidimensional hierarchical structure. This hierarchical model was stable over time and showed good concordance with categorical diagnoses. The combined use of dimensional and categorical approach to psychotic disorders would be of clinical and research utility.
Authors: Colm McDonald; Ed Bullmore; Pak Sham; Xavier Chitnis; John Suckling; James MacCabe; Muriel Walshe; Robin M Murray Journal: Br J Psychiatry Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 9.319
Authors: M Maziade; S Bouchard; N Gingras; L Charron; A Cardinal; M A Roy; B Gauthier; G Tremblay; S Côté; C Fournier; P Boutin; M Hamel; C Mérette; M Martinez Journal: Br J Psychiatry Date: 1996-09 Impact factor: 9.319
Authors: A Demjaha; K Morgan; C Morgan; S Landau; K Dean; A Reichenberg; P Sham; P Fearon; G Hutchinson; P B Jones; R M Murray; P Dazzan Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2009-07-23 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Robin M Murray; Pak Sham; Jim Van Os; Jolanta Zanelli; Mary Cannon; Colm McDonald Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2004-12-01 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Valeria Mondelli; Paola Dazzan; Nilay Hepgul; Marta Di Forti; Monica Aas; Alessandro D'Albenzio; Marco Di Nicola; Helen Fisher; Rowena Handley; Tiago Reis Marques; Craig Morgan; Serena Navari; Heather Taylor; Andrew Papadopoulos; Katherine J Aitchison; Robin M Murray; Carmine M Pariante Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2009-09-13 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: James B Kirkbride; Paul Fearon; Craig Morgan; Paola Dazzan; Kevin Morgan; Jane Tarrant; Tuhina Lloyd; John Holloway; Gerard Hutchinson; Julian P Leff; Rosemarie M Mallett; Glynn L Harrison; Robin M Murray; Peter B Jones Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2006-03
Authors: E Sacchetti; C Magri; A Minelli; P Valsecchi; M Traversa; S Calza; A Vita; M Gennarelli Journal: Pharmacogenomics J Date: 2016-02-09 Impact factor: 3.550
Authors: Roman Kotov; Katherine G Jonas; William T Carpenter; Michael N Dretsch; Nicholas R Eaton; Miriam K Forbes; Kelsie T Forbush; Kelsey Hobbs; Ulrich Reininghaus; Tim Slade; Susan C South; Matthew Sunderland; Monika A Waszczuk; Thomas A Widiger; Aidan G C Wright; David H Zald; Robert F Krueger; David Watson Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 49.548