BACKGROUND: Gene fusions between the ERG transcription factor and the androgen-regulated gene TMPRSS2 occur in a subset of prostate cancers and contribute to transformation of prostatic epithelial cells. Prior reports have used fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or quantitative PCR (QPCR) to determine the presence of TMPRSS2-ERG fusions or ERG expression, respectively. Recently, several groups have reported on immunohistochemistry (IHC) to measure ERG expression, which is much more readily performed in clinical practice. However, the prior studies examining ERG expression by IHC had small sample sizes or they failed to clarify the association of ERG protein expression with important clinico-pathological features or prostate cancer-specific mortality. METHODS: To address these deficits, we evaluated ERG expression by IHC in 208 radical prostatectomy samples from the Kaiser Permanente Molecular Epidemiology of Fatal Prostate Cancer (MEFPC) study, a case-control study of prostate cancer-specific mortality. RESULTS: Nuclear ERG expression was seen in neoplastic prostate epithelia in 49 of the samples (23.7%). ERG expression in tumor cells was associated with higher tumor stage (OR = 2.0, 95% confidence interval 1.0-4.0, P value = 0.04). ERG immunoreactivity was positively associated with prostate cancer-specific mortality, although the confidence interval was wide (OR = 1.9, 95% confidence interval 0.88-4.0, P value = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that ERG protein expression is readily quantifiable with an existing commercial antibody. Evaluating ERG protein expression may improve our ability to identify the subset of more aggressive, invasive prostate cancers.
BACKGROUND: Gene fusions between the ERG transcription factor and the androgen-regulated gene TMPRSS2 occur in a subset of prostate cancers and contribute to transformation of prostatic epithelial cells. Prior reports have used fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or quantitative PCR (QPCR) to determine the presence of TMPRSS2-ERG fusions or ERG expression, respectively. Recently, several groups have reported on immunohistochemistry (IHC) to measure ERG expression, which is much more readily performed in clinical practice. However, the prior studies examining ERG expression by IHC had small sample sizes or they failed to clarify the association of ERG protein expression with important clinico-pathological features or prostate cancer-specific mortality. METHODS: To address these deficits, we evaluated ERG expression by IHC in 208 radical prostatectomy samples from the Kaiser Permanente Molecular Epidemiology of Fatal Prostate Cancer (MEFPC) study, a case-control study of prostate cancer-specific mortality. RESULTS: Nuclear ERG expression was seen in neoplastic prostate epithelia in 49 of the samples (23.7%). ERG expression in tumor cells was associated with higher tumor stage (OR = 2.0, 95% confidence interval 1.0-4.0, P value = 0.04). ERG immunoreactivity was positively associated with prostate cancer-specific mortality, although the confidence interval was wide (OR = 1.9, 95% confidence interval 0.88-4.0, P value = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that ERG protein expression is readily quantifiable with an existing commercial antibody. Evaluating ERG protein expression may improve our ability to identify the subset of more aggressive, invasive prostate cancers.
Authors: Scott A Tomlins; Daniel R Rhodes; Sven Perner; Saravana M Dhanasekaran; Rohit Mehra; Xiao-Wei Sun; Sooryanarayana Varambally; Xuhong Cao; Joelle Tchinda; Rainer Kuefer; Charles Lee; James E Montie; Rajal B Shah; Kenneth J Pienta; Mark A Rubin; Arul M Chinnaiyan Journal: Science Date: 2005-10-28 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Andreas Pettersson; Rebecca E Graff; Scott R Bauer; Michael J Pitt; Rosina T Lis; Edward C Stack; Neil E Martin; Lauren Kunz; Kathryn L Penney; Azra H Ligon; Catherine Suppan; Richard Flavin; Howard D Sesso; Jennifer R Rider; Christopher Sweeney; Meir J Stampfer; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Philip W Kantoff; Martin G Sanda; Edward L Giovannucci; Eric L Ding; Massimo Loda; Lorelei A Mucci Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2012-06-26 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: F Demichelis; K Fall; S Perner; O Andrén; F Schmidt; S R Setlur; Y Hoshida; J-M Mosquera; Y Pawitan; C Lee; H-O Adami; L A Mucci; P W Kantoff; S-O Andersson; A M Chinnaiyan; J-E Johansson; M A Rubin Journal: Oncogene Date: 2007-01-22 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Scott A Tomlins; Bharathi Laxman; Sooryanarayana Varambally; Xuhong Cao; Jindan Yu; Beth E Helgeson; Qi Cao; John R Prensner; Mark A Rubin; Rajal B Shah; Rohit Mehra; Arul M Chinnaiyan Journal: Neoplasia Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 5.715
Authors: Brett S Carver; Jennifer Tran; Anuradha Gopalan; Zhenbang Chen; Safa Shaikh; Arkaitz Carracedo; Andrea Alimonti; Caterina Nardella; Shohreh Varmeh; Peter T Scardino; Carlos Cordon-Cardo; William Gerald; Pier Paolo Pandolfi Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2009-04-26 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Olga Klezovitch; Michael Risk; Ilsa Coleman; Jared M Lucas; Manda Null; Lawrence D True; Peter S Nelson; Valeri Vasioukhin Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-02-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jennifer C King; Jin Xu; John Wongvipat; Haley Hieronymus; Brett S Carver; David H Leung; Barry S Taylor; Chris Sander; Robert D Cardiff; Suzana S Couto; William L Gerald; Charles L Sawyers Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2009-04-26 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Liesel M FitzGerald; Ilir Agalliu; Karynn Johnson; Melinda A Miller; Erika M Kwon; Antonio Hurtado-Coll; Ladan Fazli; Ashish B Rajput; Martin E Gleave; Michael E Cox; Elaine A Ostrander; Janet L Stanford; David G Huntsman Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2008-08-11 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: R K Nam; L Sugar; W Yang; S Srivastava; L H Klotz; L-Y Yang; A Stanimirovic; E Encioiu; M Neill; D A Loblaw; J Trachtenberg; S A Narod; A Seth Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2007-10-30 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: James D Brooks; Wei Wei; Sarah Hawley; Heidi Auman; Lisa Newcomb; Hilary Boyer; Ladan Fazli; Jeff Simko; Antonio Hurtado-Coll; Dean A Troyer; Peter R Carroll; Martin Gleave; Raymond Lance; Daniel W Lin; Peter S Nelson; Ian M Thompson; Lawrence D True; Ziding Feng; Jesse K McKenney Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-07-14 Impact factor: 3.240