Literature DB >> 23661345

Value of Glut-1 and Koc markers in the differential diagnosis of reactive mesothelial hyperplasia, malignant mesothelioma and pulmonary adenocarcinoma.

Özlem Üçer1, Adile Ferda Dağli, Ahmet Kiliçarslan, Gökhan Artaş.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Malignant mesothelioma (MM) is a primary malignant tumor developing from mesothelial cells lining the serosal surfaces and particularly the pleura, and has a very poor prognosis. It may display a variety of histological patterns and has a wide spectrum of cytomorphological characteristics, causing problems in its differential diagnosis from lung adenocarcinomas and sometimes from benign mesothelial proliferations. Immunohistochemical examination is the most useful method for this distinction. In our study, we aimed to determine the value of glucose transporter isoform-1 (GLUT-1) and K homology domain-containing protein (KOC) markers in the differential diagnosis of reactive mesothelial hyperplasia, malignant mesothelioma and lung adenocarcinoma. MATERIAL AND
METHOD: Our study included 30 samples of malignant mesothelioma, 30 samples of pulmonary adenocarcinoma and 30 samples of reactive mesothelial hyperplasia selected from the archives of the Fırat University Hospital's Pathology Department Laboratory. The samples were applied GLUT-1 and KOC markers by immunohistochemistry and the place of these markers in the differential diagnosis was examined.
RESULTS: GLUT-1 was found positive in 80% of malignant mesothelioma cases, 83.3% of adenocarcinoma cases and 6.6% of reactive mesothelial hyperplasia cases. KOC was positive in 83.3% of malignant mesothelioma cases, 76.6% of adenocarcinoma cases and 46.6% of reactive mesothelial hyperplasia cases. There was no statistically significant difference between malignant mesothelioma and lung adenocarcinoma cases in terms of the diffuseness and intensity of staining with GLUT-1, whereas a significant difference was established when these groups were compared with reactive mesothelial hyperplasia cases. However, the KOC staining diffuseness and intensity results were similar to those obtained with GLUT-1.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, GLUT-1 and KOC markers do not differentiate malignant mesotheliomas from pulmonary adenocarcinomas but can be useful in differentiating reactive mesothelial hyperplasia from malignant mesothelioma and lung adenocarcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23661345     DOI: 10.5146/tjpath.2013.01158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk Patoloji Derg        ISSN: 1018-5615


  4 in total

1.  The Role of CD90 in the Differential Diagnosis of Pleural Malignant Mesothelioma, Pulmonary Carcinoma and Comparison with Calretının.

Authors:  Nurhan Sahin; Ayse Nur Akatli; Muhammet Reha Celik; Hakkı Ulutas; Emine Turkmen Samdanci; Cemil Colak
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.201

2.  Clinical significance of COX-2, GLUT-1 and VEGF expressions in endometrial cancer tissues.

Authors:  Xiaoping Ma; Yuzuo Hui; Li Lin; Yu Wu; Xian Zhang; Peishu Liu
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.088

3.  A Cause of Bilateral Chylothorax: A Case of Mesothelioma without Pleural Involvement during Initial Diagnosis.

Authors:  Ercan Kurtipek; Meryem İlkay Eren Karanis; Nuri Düzgün; Hıdır Esme; Mustafa Çaycı
Journal:  Case Rep Pulmonol       Date:  2015-09-16

4.  IMP3 overexpression occurs in various important cancer types and is linked to aggressive tumor features: A tissue microarray study on 8,877 human cancers and normal tissues.

Authors:  Christoph Burdelski; Nilofar Jakani-Karimi; Frank Jacobsen; Christina Möller-Koop; Sarah Minner; Ronald Simon; Guido Sauter; Stefan Steurer; Till S Clauditz; Waldemar Wilczak
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 3.906

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.