Literature DB >> 23661274

Staphylococcal biofilm growth on smooth and porous titanium coatings for biomedical applications.

Annabel Braem1, Lieve Van Mellaert, Tina Mattheys, Dorien Hofmans, Evelien De Waelheyns, Liesbet Geris, Jozef Anné, Jan Schrooten, Jef Vleugels.   

Abstract

Implant-related infections are a serious complication in prosthetic surgery, substantially jeopardizing implant fixation. As porous coatings for improved osseointegration typically present an increased surface roughness, their resulting large surface area (sometimes increasing with over 700% compared to an ideal plane) renders the implant extremely susceptible to bacterial colonization and subsequent biofilm formation. Therefore, there is particular interest in orthopaedic implantology to engineer surfaces that combine both the ability to improve osseointegration and at the same time reduce the infection risk. As part of this orthopaedic coating development, the interest of in vitro studies on the interaction between implant surfaces and bacteria/biofilms is growing. In this study, the in vitro staphylococcal adhesion and biofilm formation on newly developed porous pure Ti coatings with 50% porosity and pore sizes up to 50 μm is compared to various dense and porous Ti or Ti-6Al-4V reference surfaces. Multiple linear regression analysis indicates that surface roughness and hydrophobicity are the main determinants for bacterial adherence. Accordingly, the novel coatings display a significant reduction of up to five times less bacterial surface colonization when compared to a commercial state-of-the-art vacuum plasma sprayed coating. However, the results also show that a further expansion of the porosity with over 15% and/or the pore size up to 150 μm is correlated to a significant increase in the roughness parameters resulting in an ascent of bacterial attachment. Chemically modifying the Ti surface in order to improve its hydrophilicity, while preserving the average roughness, is found to strongly decrease bacteria quantities, indicating the importance of surface functionalization to reduce the infection risk of porous coatings.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Staphylococci; biofilm formation; porous Ti coating; roughness; surface properties

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23661274     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.34688

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A        ISSN: 1549-3296            Impact factor:   4.396


  23 in total

Review 1.  Antimicrobial technology in orthopedic and spinal implants.

Authors:  Adam Em Eltorai; Jack Haglin; Sudheesha Perera; Bielinsky A Brea; Roy Ruttiman; Dioscaris R Garcia; Christopher T Born; Alan H Daniels
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-06-18

2.  Bacterial adhesion to biological versus polymer prosthetic materials used in abdominal wall defect repair: do these meshes show any differences in vitro?

Authors:  B Pérez-Köhler; S Sotomayor; M Rodríguez; M I Gegúndez; G Pascual; J M Bellón
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Surface modification of bulk titanium substrates for biomedical applications via low-temperature microwave hydrothermal oxidation.

Authors:  Alice Cheng; W Brandon Goodwin; Ben M deGlee; Rolando A Gittens; Jonathan P Vernon; Sharon L Hyzy; Zvi Schwartz; Kenneth H Sandhage; Barbara D Boyan
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 4.396

4.  Inhibition of biofilm formation on iodine-supported titanium implants.

Authors:  Daisuke Inoue; Tamon Kabata; Kaori Ohtani; Yoshitomo Kajino; Toshiharu Shirai; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  Medical Applications of Porous Biomaterials: Features of Porosity and Tissue-Specific Implications for Biocompatibility.

Authors:  Jamie L Hernandez; Kim A Woodrow
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 11.092

Review 6.  Multi-disciplinary antimicrobial strategies for improving orthopaedic implants to prevent prosthetic joint infections in hip and knee.

Authors:  Matthew A Getzlaf; Eric A Lewallen; Hilal M Kremers; Dakota L Jones; Carolina A Bonin; Amel Dudakovic; Roman Thaler; Robert C Cohen; David G Lewallen; Andre J van Wijnen
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 7.  Current Options and Emerging Biomaterials for Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

Authors:  Ashley E Levack; Erika L Cyphert; Mathias P Bostrom; Christopher J Hernandez; Horst A von Recum; Alberto V Carli
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 8.  Antibacterial surface treatment for orthopaedic implants.

Authors:  Jiri Gallo; Martin Holinka; Calin S Moucha
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Periprosthetic hip infections in a Swedish regional hospital between 2012 and 2018: is there a relationship between Cutibacterium acnes infections and uncemented prostheses?

Authors:  Urban Hedlundh; Michail Zacharatos; Jonas Magnusson; Magnus Gottlander; Johanna Karlsson
Journal:  J Bone Jt Infect       Date:  2021-06-04

10.  Role of nanostructured gold surfaces on monocyte activation and Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation.

Authors:  Sara Svensson; Magnus Forsberg; Mats Hulander; Forugh Vazirisani; Anders Palmquist; Jukka Lausmaa; Peter Thomsen; Margarita Trobos
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2014-02-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.