Literature DB >> 23660809

The impracticality of MRI for the diagnosis of atypical penile fracture in the emergency setting.

Matthew J Maurice1, J Patrick Spirnak2.   

Abstract

We report the case of a patient who presented to the emergency department with a history suspicious for penile fracture without typical physical exam findings. A small penile fracture was present on MRI, but the diagnosis was missed, and surgery was withheld owing to this misinformation. Despite its technical accuracy, MRI may be impractical for the diagnosis of penile fracture in the emergency setting. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Trauma; imaging, CT/MRI; management, emergency department management; uro-genital

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23660809     DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2013-202677

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  3 in total

1.  Older age and a large tunical tear may be predictors of increased erectile dysfunction rates following penile fracture surgery.

Authors:  Mazhar Ortac; Faruk Özgor; Ufuk Caglar; Abdullah Esmeray; Metin Savun; Ömer Sarılar
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 2.896

2.  Suspected penile fracture: to operate or not to operate?

Authors:  Ian S Metzler; Amanda B Reed-Maldonado; Tom F Lue
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-10

Review 3.  Alteration in the etiology of penile fracture in the Middle East and Central Asia regions in the last decade; a literature review.

Authors:  Ahmad A Majzoub; Onder Canguven; Talib A Raidh
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.