Literature DB >> 23660568

Long-term trends mask variation in the direction and magnitude of short-term phenological shifts.

Amy M Iler1, Toke T Høye, David W Inouye, Niels M Schmidt.   

Abstract

PREMISE OF THE STUDY: Plants are flowering earlier in response to climate change. However, substantial interannual variation in phenology may make it difficult to discern and compare long-term trends. In addition to providing insight on data requirements for discerning such trends, phenological shifts within subsets of long-term records will provide insight into the mechanisms driving changes in flowering over longer time scales.
METHODS: To examine variation in flowering shifts among temporal subsets of long-term records, we used two data sets of flowering phenology from snow-dominated habitats: subalpine meadow in Gothic, Colorado, USA (38 yr), and arctic tundra in Zackenberg, Greenland (16 yr). Shifts in flowering time were calculated as 10-yr moving averages for onset, peak, and end of flowering. KEY
RESULTS: Flowering advanced over the course of the entire time series at both sites. Flowering shifts at Gothic were variable, with some 10-yr time frames showing significant delays and others significant advancements. Early-flowering species were more responsive than later-flowering species, while the opposite was true at Zackenberg. Flowering shifts at Zackenberg were less variable, with advanced flowering across all 10-yr time frames. At both sites, long-term advancement seemed to be primarily driven by strong advancements in flowering in the 1990s and early 2000s.
CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of long-term trends can mask substantial variation in phenological shifts through time. This variation in the direction and magnitude of phenological shifts has implications for the evolution of flowering time and for interspecific interactions with flowering plants and can provide more detailed insights into the dynamics of phenological responses to climate change.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory; Zackenberg; arctic tundra; climate change; moving average; phenology; snowmelt; subalpine; subsampling; variation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23660568     DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1200490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bot        ISSN: 0002-9122            Impact factor:   3.844


  9 in total

1.  Estimating the onset of spring from a complex phenology database: trade-offs across geographic scales.

Authors:  Katharine L Gerst; Jherime L Kellermann; Carolyn A F Enquist; Alyssa H Rosemartin; Ellen G Denny
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 3.787

2.  Advancing the long view of ecological change in tundra systems. Introduction.

Authors:  Eric Post; Toke T Høye
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Nonlinear flowering responses to climate: are species approaching their limits of phenological change?

Authors:  Amy M Iler; Toke T Høye; David W Inouye; Niels M Schmidt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Long-term linear trends mask phenological shifts.

Authors:  Yongshuo H Fu; Shilong Piao; Philippe Ciais; Mengtian Huang; Annette Menzel; Marc Peaucelle; Shushi Peng; Yang Song; Yann Vitasse; Zhenzhong Zeng; Hongfang Zhao; Guiyun Zhou; Josep Peñuelas; Ivan A Janssens
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.787

5.  Shifts in flowering phenology reshape a subalpine plant community.

Authors:  Paul J CaraDonna; Amy M Iler; David W Inouye
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Prediction of Arctic plant phenological sensitivity to climate change from historical records.

Authors:  Zoe A Panchen; Root Gorelick
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 7.  Senescence: The Compromised Time of Death That Plants May Call on Themselves.

Authors:  Matin Miryeganeh
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 8.  Phenological overlap of interacting species in a changing climate: an assessment of available approaches.

Authors:  Nicole E Rafferty; Paul J Caradonna; Laura A Burkle; Amy M Iler; Judith L Bronstein
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Diminished response of arctic plants to warming over time.

Authors:  Kelseyann S Kremers; Robert D Hollister; Steven F Oberbauer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.