Literature DB >> 23660273

Analysis of the effect of various decalcification agents on the quantity and quality of nucleic acid (DNA and RNA) recovered from bone biopsies.

Veena M Singh1, Ranelle C Salunga, Vivian J Huang, Yen Tran, Mark Erlander, Pam Plumlee, Michael R Peterson.   

Abstract

Molecular studies are part of standard care for cancer patients. Bone, a common and sometimes sole site of metastasis, requires decalcification for morphological examination. Many commonly used decalcification agents contain strong acids that degrade nucleic acids. The paradigm shift in oncology, with biomarker targeted therapy and gene expression profiling analysis, requires sufficient nucleic acid recovery from bone biopsy specimens. We systematically studied the effects of a spectrum of decalcification agents on the quantity and quality of RNA and DNA recovered from bone biopsies. Multiple bone biopsies of similar size and cellularity were fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin, randomized to various decalcification agents for 2 hours then processed, and embedded. Tissue lysates were obtained from unstained sections and nucleic acid isolated. DNA and RNA were quantified. Assessment of DNA and RNA integrity was accomplished by comparison of the average cycle threshold by polymerase chain reaction of selected housekeeping genes for each agent. Results were then analyzed by 2-sample t test. There was a significant decrease in both DNA and RNA yield and integrity with strong acids (hydrochloric, nitric) vs 14% EDTA and formic acid. DNA yield was (mean nanograms) 6.15 vs 68.68 (P<.001) and RNA was (mean nanograms) 121.53 vs 288.89 (P=.003), respectively. DNA integrity (mean cycle threshold) was 35.79 vs 30.16 (P<.001), and RNA was 33.03 vs 26.5 (P<.001), respectively. Decalcification of bone biopsies with EDTA or formic acid agents was associated with a significant improvement in recovered nucleic acid quantity and quality.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone biopsies; Decalcification agents; Metastatic cancer; Molecular analysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23660273     DOI: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2013.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Diagn Pathol        ISSN: 1092-9134            Impact factor:   2.090


  28 in total

1.  Concurrent fine needle aspirations and core needle biopsies: a comparative study of substrates for next-generation sequencing in solid organ malignancies.

Authors:  Sinchita Roy-Chowdhuri; Hui Chen; Rajesh R Singh; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Keyur P Patel; Mark J Routbort; Jawad Manekia; Bedia A Barkoh; Hui Yao; Sharjeel Sabir; Russell R Broaddus; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Gregg Staerkel; John Stewart; Rajyalakshmi Luthra
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 2.  Overview of clinicopathologic features of ALK-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma and current diagnostic testing for ALK rearrangement.

Authors:  Hyojin Kim; Jin-Haeng Chung
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2015-04

3.  A Paracrine Role for IL6 in Prostate Cancer Patients: Lack of Production by Primary or Metastatic Tumor Cells.

Authors:  Shu-Han Yu; Qizhi Zheng; David Esopi; Anne Macgregor-Das; Jun Luo; Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Charles G Drake; Robert Vessella; Colm Morrissey; Angelo M De Marzo; Karen S Sfanos
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Res       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 11.151

Review 4.  Precision medicine for metastatic breast cancer--limitations and solutions.

Authors:  Monica Arnedos; Cecile Vicier; Sherene Loi; Celine Lefebvre; Stefan Michiels; Herve Bonnefoi; Fabrice Andre
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Development of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Assays for Postmortem Detection of Mycobacterium spp. Common in Zebrafish (Danio rerio) Research Colonies.

Authors:  Danielle M Meritet; Donna M Mulrooney; Michael L Kent; Christiane V Löhr
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 1.232

6.  Double PIK3CA mutations in cis increase oncogenicity and sensitivity to PI3Kα inhibitors.

Authors:  Pedram Razavi; Jared L Johnson; Hong Shao; Neil Vasan; Hardik Shah; Alesia Antoine; Erik Ladewig; Alexander Gorelick; Ting-Yu Lin; Eneda Toska; Guotai Xu; Abiha Kazmi; Matthew T Chang; Barry S Taylor; Maura N Dickler; Komal Jhaveri; Sarat Chandarlapaty; Raul Rabadan; Ed Reznik; Melissa L Smith; Robert Sebra; Frauke Schimmoller; Timothy R Wilson; Lori S Friedman; Lewis C Cantley; Maurizio Scaltriti; José Baselga
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  The Importance of Biopsy in the Era of Molecular Medicine.

Authors:  Etay Ziv; Jeremy C Durack; Stephen B Solomon
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.360

8.  Expression of fibroblast growth factor receptor1, -2c, and -3c transcripts in mouse molars after tooth eruption.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Kano; Tsuyoshi Morita; Kaori Sumida; Hiromichi Yumoto; Otto Baba
Journal:  Anat Sci Int       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 1.741

9.  Rebiopsy during disease progression in patients treated by TKI for oncogene-addicted NSCLC.

Authors:  Cecile Bosc; Gilbert R Ferretti; Jacques Cadranel; Clarisse Audigier-Valette; Benjamin Besse; Fabrice Barlesi; Chantal Decroisette; Sylvie Lantuejoul; François Arbib; Denis Moro-Sibilot
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 4.493

10.  Influence of decalcification procedures on immunohistochemistry and molecular pathology in breast cancer.

Authors:  Willemijne A M E Schrijver; Petra van der Groep; Laurien Dc Hoefnagel; Natalie D Ter Hoeve; Ton Peeters; Cathy B Moelans; Paul J van Diest
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 7.842

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.