Literature DB >> 23659750

Laparoscopic vessel sealing technologies.

Stephen D Lyons1, Kenneth S K Law.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic vessel sealing devices have revolutionized modern laparoscopy. These devices fall into 2 major categories: advanced bipolar and ultrasonic instruments. The range of tissue effects available with these technologies is more limited than with conventional monopolar electrosurgery; however, both advanced bipolar and ultrasonic devices efficiently seal vessels (≤7-mm and ≤5-mm diameter, respectively), and most also have built-in tissue transection capabilities. These technologies have been the subject of a range of comparative studies on their relative advantages and disadvantages, and, to date, neither advanced bipolar or ultrasonic devices has been proven to be superior. Crown
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23659750     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  14 in total

1.  Surface-processing technology of a microgrooving and water-repellent coating improves the fusion potential of an ultrasonic energy device.

Authors:  Satoru Okada; Junichi Shimada; Kazuhiro Ito; Tatsuo Ishii; Koichiro Oshiumi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Comparison of the harmonic focus and the thunderbeat for open thyroidectomy.

Authors:  Sam Van Slycke; Jean-Pierre Gillardin; Klaas Van Den Heede; Joan Minguet; Hubert Vermeersch; Nele Brusselaers
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Implementation of a novel efficacy score to compare sealing and cutting devices in a porcine model.

Authors:  Lea Brecht; Markus Wallwiener; Sarah Schott; Christoph Domschke; Christine Dinkic; Michael Golatta; Florian Schuetz; Herbert Fluhr; Albrecht Stenzinger; Marietta Kirchner; Christof Sohn; Joachim Rom
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Comparative Analysis of Peri-Operative Outcomes Following Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy with Conventional Bipolar-Electrosurgery versus High-Pressure Pulsed LigaSure Use.

Authors:  Sanskriti Batra; Punita Bhardwaj; Mamta Dagar
Journal:  Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther       Date:  2022-05-04

5.  Efficacy and Safety of Combined Ultrasonic and Bipolar Energy Source in Laparoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  Daniel C Steinemann; Sebastian H Lamm; Andreas Zerz
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Cerenkov Luminescence Imaging in Prostate Cancer: Not the Only Light That Shines.

Authors:  Judith Olde Heuvel; Berlinda J de Wit-van der Veen; Henk G van der Poel; Pim J van Leeuwen; Elise M Bekers; Maarten R Grootendorst; Kunal N Vyas; Cornelis H Slump; Marcel P M Stokkel
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 11.082

7.  Consistency and sealing of advanced bipolar tissue sealers.

Authors:  Edward G Chekan; Mark A Davison; David W Singleton; John Z Mennone; Piet Hinoul
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2015-04-20

Review 8.  Performance of Harmonic devices in surgical oncology: an umbrella review of the evidence.

Authors:  Hang Cheng; Jeffrey W Clymer; Behnam Sadeghirad; Nicole C Ferko; Chris G Cameron; Joseph F Amaral
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 2.754

9.  Validation of a Laparoscopic Ferromagnetic Technology-based Vessel Sealing Device and Comparative Study to Ultrasonic and Bipolar Laparoscopic Devices.

Authors:  Jennwood Chen; Curtis R Jensen; Preston K Manwaring; Robert E Glasgow
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.719

10.  Comparison of Harmonic scalpel and Ligasure devices in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Serdar Kirmizi; Cuneyt Kayaalp; Servet Karagul; Ali Tardu; Ismail Ertugrul; Fatih Sumer; Mehmet Ali Yagci
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 1.195

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.