Literature DB >> 23659743

Immunogenicity and safety of a natural rough mutant of Brucella suis as a vaccine for swine.

William C Stoffregen1, Charley S Johnson, Steven C Olsen.   

Abstract

The objective of the current study was to evaluate the safety, immunogenicity and clearance of the natural rough mutant of Brucella suis strain 353-1 (353-1) as a vaccine in domestic swine. In three studies encompassing 105 animals, pigs were inoculated with 353-1 by conjunctival (5 × 10(7) CFU) or IM (1-2 × 10(10) CFU) routes. Clearance, tissue distribution, and pathology of the vaccine strain were determined by periodic blood culture, collection of tissues at periodic necropsy times after vaccination, and histologic evaluation of tissue samples. The B. suis 353-1 strain was nonpathogenic, cleared from most vaccinates by 10-12 weeks after vaccination, and did not induce significant histologic lesions in tissues examined. The vaccine strain appears to be phenotypically stable as all isolates recovered from vaccinates retained their rough phenotype. Vaccination induced significant humoral responses, peripheral blood mononuclear cell proliferation, and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) production after inoculation as compared to responses of control pigs. The vaccine strain did not appear to be shed from vaccinates as co-housed sentinel animals demonstrated no serologic or microbiologic evidence of lateral transmission. Our data demonstrates that B. suis 353-1 is a stable, rough mutant that does not induce adverse clinical effects or tissue localization, but does induce significant humoral and cellular immune responses after vaccination of swine. Published by Elsevier India Pvt Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brucella; Cellular immunity; Vaccine; Zoonoses-bacterial

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23659743     DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2013.04.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Vet Sci        ISSN: 0034-5288            Impact factor:   2.534


  7 in total

1.  Improving the methods for isolation of monocyte and establishing macrophage cell culture in caprine model.

Authors:  Nurrul Nasruddin Shaqinah; Mazlan Mazlina; M Zamri-Saad; Hamzah Hazilawati; Sabri Jasni
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 2.058

2.  Coincidence cloning recovery of Brucella melitensis RNA from goat tissues: advancing the in vivo analysis of pathogen gene expression in brucellosis.

Authors:  Paola M Boggiatto; Daniel Fitzsimmons; Darrell O Bayles; David Alt; Catherine E Vrentas; Steven C Olsen
Journal:  BMC Mol Biol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 2.946

Review 3.  Swine brucellosis: current perspectives.

Authors:  S C Olsen; F M Tatum
Journal:  Vet Med (Auckl)       Date:  2016-12-20

Review 4.  Uncovering the Hidden Credentials of Brucella Virulence.

Authors:  R Martin Roop; Ian S Barton; Dariel Hopersberger; Daniel W Martin
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 11.056

5.  Vaccine safety studies of Brucella abortus S19 and S19ΔvjbR in pregnant swine.

Authors:  Slim Zriba; Daniel G Garcia-Gonzalez; Omar H Khalaf; Lance Wheeler; Sankar P Chaki; Allison Rice-Ficht; Thomas A Ficht; Angela M Arenas-Gamboa
Journal:  Vaccine X       Date:  2019-08-22

6.  Tulathromycin treatment does not affect bacterial dissemination or clearance of Brucella melitensis 16M following experimental infection of goats.

Authors:  Paola M Boggiatto; Steven C Olsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Whole-genome sequencing of rough Brucella melitensis in China provides insights into its genetic features.

Authors:  Xiaowen Yang; Dongri Piao; Lingling Mao; Bo Pang; Hongyan Zhao; Guozhong Tian; Hai Jiang; Biao Kan
Journal:  Emerg Microbes Infect       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 7.163

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.