Literature DB >> 23659578

Classification of dynamic facial expressions of emotion presented briefly.

Guillermo Recio1, Annekathrin Schacht, Werner Sommer.   

Abstract

A number of studies have shown an impact of speed of a developing facial expression of emotion on its recognition and perceived naturalness. Still, the impact of speed at constant, short presentation times, as normally used in many experiments is unclear. In the present study participants classified faces displaying facial expressions of six basic emotions in static and dynamic presentation modes and three different types of neutral movements. Stimuli were created with computer software that allows fine-grained control over action units and dynamic features. Rise times in dynamic expressions varied between 200 and 900 ms. Results replicated classical findings showing better performance for expressions of happiness, and frequent confusions among morphologically similar expressions, and a general dynamic facilitation for most expressions. Importantly, dynamic presentation as such facilitated a more accurate classification, but variations in speed at the fast range studied here had no noticeable effect for expressions of anger, fear, happiness, and surprise. The main exception was sadness, which was best recognised at slow speed and in static pictures, and disgust, which was most unambiguously categorised at fast to moderate speed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23659578     DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2013.794128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Emot        ISSN: 0269-9931


  16 in total

1.  Brain signatures of perceiving a smile: Time course and source localization.

Authors:  David Beltrán; Manuel G Calvo
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Relationship Between Gender and Performance on Emotion Perception Tasks in a Latino Population.

Authors:  Alvaro Cavieres; Rocío Maldonado; Amy Bland; Rebecca Elliott
Journal:  Int J Psychol Res (Medellin)       Date:  2021 Jan-Jun

3.  Test battery for measuring the perception and recognition of facial expressions of emotion.

Authors:  Oliver Wilhelm; Andrea Hildebrandt; Karsten Manske; Annekathrin Schacht; Werner Sommer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-05-13

4.  Validation of the Amsterdam Dynamic Facial Expression Set--Bath Intensity Variations (ADFES-BIV): A Set of Videos Expressing Low, Intermediate, and High Intensity Emotions.

Authors:  Tanja S H Wingenbach; Chris Ashwin; Mark Brosnan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Sex differences in facial emotion recognition across varying expression intensity levels from videos.

Authors:  Tanja S H Wingenbach; Chris Ashwin; Mark Brosnan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Approach-avoidance of facial affect is moderated by the presence of an observer-irrelevant trigger.

Authors:  S B Renard; P J de Jong; G H M Pijnenborg
Journal:  Motiv Emot       Date:  2016-11-02

7.  A robust method for measuring an individual's sensitivity to facial expressions.

Authors:  Louise S Delicato
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Human Observers and Automated Assessment of Dynamic Emotional Facial Expressions: KDEF-dyn Database Validation.

Authors:  Manuel G Calvo; Andrés Fernández-Martín; Guillermo Recio; Daniel Lundqvist
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-10-26

9.  Singing emotionally: a study of pre-production, production, and post-production facial expressions.

Authors:  Lena R Quinto; William F Thompson; Christian Kroos; Caroline Palmer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-04-29

10.  Performance Feedback Processing Is Positively Biased As Predicted by Attribution Theory.

Authors:  Christoph W Korn; Gabriela Rosenblau; Julia M Rodriguez Buritica; Hauke R Heekeren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.