OBJECTIVE: The research tested the efficacy of partner- and planning-based interventions to reduce dietary fat intake over a 6-month period. DESIGN: Randomized controlled, blinded, parallel trial. METHODS: A computer randomization feature was used to allocate council employees (N = 427, of which 393 completed baseline measures) to one of four conditions (partner + implementation intentions, partner-only, implementation intentions, and control group) before they completed measures at baseline and follow-ups at 1, 3, and 6 months post-baseline. Outcome measures were comprised of validated self-report measures of dietary fat intake (saturated fat intake, fat intake, ratio of 'good' fats to 'bad' fats); psychosocial mediators (enjoyment, intention, self-efficacy, social influence, partner support); weight and waist size (baseline and 6 months only). RESULTS: Data from 393 participants were analysed in accordance with intention-to-treat analyses. All intervention groups reported greater reductions in fat intake than the control group at 3 months. The partner-based groups increased the ratio of 'good' fats to 'bad' fats at 3 and 6 months and lost more inches on their waist, versus the non-partner groups. The impacts of the partner-based manipulations on outcomes were partially mediated by greater perceived social influences, partner support, and enjoyment of avoiding high-fat foods. The partner-based interventions also increased intention and self-efficacy. However, the effects in this study were typically small and generally marginally significant. CONCLUSIONS: Partner-based interventions had some positive benefits on dietary-related outcomes at 3 and 6 months. Support for implementation intentions was more limited.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: The research tested the efficacy of partner- and planning-based interventions to reduce dietary fat intake over a 6-month period. DESIGN: Randomized controlled, blinded, parallel trial. METHODS: A computer randomization feature was used to allocate council employees (N = 427, of which 393 completed baseline measures) to one of four conditions (partner + implementation intentions, partner-only, implementation intentions, and control group) before they completed measures at baseline and follow-ups at 1, 3, and 6 months post-baseline. Outcome measures were comprised of validated self-report measures of dietary fat intake (saturated fat intake, fat intake, ratio of 'good' fats to 'bad' fats); psychosocial mediators (enjoyment, intention, self-efficacy, social influence, partner support); weight and waist size (baseline and 6 months only). RESULTS: Data from 393 participants were analysed in accordance with intention-to-treat analyses. All intervention groups reported greater reductions in fat intake than the control group at 3 months. The partner-based groups increased the ratio of 'good' fats to 'bad' fats at 3 and 6 months and lost more inches on their waist, versus the non-partner groups. The impacts of the partner-based manipulations on outcomes were partially mediated by greater perceived social influences, partner support, and enjoyment of avoiding high-fat foods. The partner-based interventions also increased intention and self-efficacy. However, the effects in this study were typically small and generally marginally significant. CONCLUSIONS: Partner-based interventions had some positive benefits on dietary-related outcomes at 3 and 6 months. Support for implementation intentions was more limited.
Authors: Rachel Margaret Carr; Eleanor Quested; Andreas Stenling; Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani; Andrew Prestwich; Daniel Frank Gucciardi; Joanne McVeigh; Nikos Ntoumanis Journal: Health Psychol Behav Med Date: 2021-04-07
Authors: Vickà Versele; Annick Bogaerts; Roland Devlieger; Christophe Matthys; Leonardo Gucciardo; Tom Deliens; Peter Clarys; Dirk Aerenhouts Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2022-09-06
Authors: Theda Radtke; Aleksandra Luszczynska; Konstantin Schenkel; Stuart Biddle; Urte Scholz Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2018-07-24 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Sharon Manne; David Buller; Katie Devine; Carolyn Heckman; Sherry Pagoto; Sara Frederick; Anna Mitarotondo Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-09-17 Impact factor: 5.428