P J Quee1, B Z Alizadeh2, A Aleman3, E R van den Heuvel2. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Rob Giel Research Center, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Neuroscience, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although cognitive subtypes have been suggested in schizophrenia patients, similar analyses have not been carried out in their non-affected siblings. Subtype classification may provide more insight into genetically driven variation in cognitive function. We investigated cognitive subtypes in siblings. METHOD: Cluster analyses were performed in 654 non-affected siblings, on a cognitive battery that included tests of attention, intellectual function and episodic memory. Resulting subtypes in the siblings were analyzed for cognitive, demographic and clinical characteristics and compared with those of their probands. RESULTS: Three sibling subtypes of cognitive function were distinguished: 'normal', 'mixed' and 'impaired'. Normal profile siblings (n = 192) were unimpaired on cognitive tests, in contrast to their proband (n = 184). Mixed profile siblings (n = 228) and their probands (n = 222) had a more similar performance pattern. Impaired profile siblings had poorer functional outcomes (n = 234) and their profile was almost identical to that of their proband (n = 223). Probands with cognitively impaired siblings could be distinguished from other schizophrenia patients by their own cognitive performance. They also had poorer clinical characteristics, including achievement of symptomatic remission. CONCLUSIONS: Unaffected siblings of patients with schizophrenia are heterogeneous with respect to cognitive function. The poorer the cognitive profile of the sibling, the higher the level of correspondence with the proband. The sibling's cognitive subtype was predictive for disease course in the proband. Distinguishing cognitive subtypes of unaffected siblings may be of relevance for genetic studies.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Although cognitive subtypes have been suggested in schizophreniapatients, similar analyses have not been carried out in their non-affected siblings. Subtype classification may provide more insight into genetically driven variation in cognitive function. We investigated cognitive subtypes in siblings. METHOD: Cluster analyses were performed in 654 non-affected siblings, on a cognitive battery that included tests of attention, intellectual function and episodic memory. Resulting subtypes in the siblings were analyzed for cognitive, demographic and clinical characteristics and compared with those of their probands. RESULTS: Three sibling subtypes of cognitive function were distinguished: 'normal', 'mixed' and 'impaired'. Normal profile siblings (n = 192) were unimpaired on cognitive tests, in contrast to their proband (n = 184). Mixed profile siblings (n = 228) and their probands (n = 222) had a more similar performance pattern. Impaired profile siblings had poorer functional outcomes (n = 234) and their profile was almost identical to that of their proband (n = 223). Probands with cognitively impaired siblings could be distinguished from other schizophreniapatients by their own cognitive performance. They also had poorer clinical characteristics, including achievement of symptomatic remission. CONCLUSIONS: Unaffected siblings of patients with schizophrenia are heterogeneous with respect to cognitive function. The poorer the cognitive profile of the sibling, the higher the level of correspondence with the proband. The sibling's cognitive subtype was predictive for disease course in the proband. Distinguishing cognitive subtypes of unaffected siblings may be of relevance for genetic studies.
Authors: Sylvia Romanowska; Michael W Best; Christopher R Bowie; Colin A Depp; Thomas L Patterson; David L Penn; Amy E Pinkham; Philip D Harvey Journal: Schizophr Res Cogn Date: 2022-04-26
Authors: Md A Islam; T D Habtewold; F D van Es; P J Quee; E R van den Heuvel; B Z Alizadeh; R Bruggeman Journal: Acta Psychiatr Scand Date: 2018-09-21 Impact factor: 6.392