| Literature DB >> 23658648 |
Éva Váradi1, Barbara Végi, Krisztina Liptói, Judit Barna.
Abstract
Conservation of indigenous poultry species is an important part of the new Hungarian agricultural strategy. Semen cryopreservation is the most practical method for the long term storage of poultry genetic material. The objective was to compare four protocols for cryopreservation of guinea fowl sperm (slow and fast programmable, freezing in nitrogen vapor, and pellet) and three cryoprotectants (10% ethylene glycol, 6% dimethyl-formamide and 6% dimethyl-acetamide). The efficiency of the methods was examined by in vitro tests (subjective motility scoring, sperm concentration, morphological and live/dead sperm analysis with eosin-aniline staining). Thereafter, the two most promising methods were tested by artificial insemination of frozen-thawed semen (3 times a week for 3 weeks using 300 million spermatozoa/hen), followed by candling of incubated eggs, assessment of fertilization, embryonic death, and hatching rate. The survival rate of live, intact spermatozoa was greatest (p≤0.05) in pellet method and the slow programmable protocol (with 10% ethylene glycol) (28.6 and 23.5%). The two best protocols (based on in vitro assessment of post-thaw semen quality) were subsequently tested in vivo with artificial insemination. The pellet method yielded a 64% fertility rate compared to slow protocol with only 30% fertility. Regardless, both freezing protocols significantly increased embryonic deaths compared to the control group (16,7; 9,1 and 8,3%, respectively). During the 3-week in vivo trial, fertility increased and early embryonic death decreased over time. According to the results the guinea fowl sperm could tolerate the fast freezing in pellet better than the slower freezing rates and resulted acceptable fertility rate.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23658648 PMCID: PMC3639159 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062759
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Experimental design of freezing protocols.
| Protocols | Slow programmable | Fast programmable | Nitrogen vapor | Pellet | |||
|
| Cryo vial | ||||||
|
| Lake’s | Tselutin’s | |||||
|
| 1∶3 | 1∶1 | |||||
|
| 25 min at 3°C | 5 min at 5°C | 5 min at 5°C | 5 min at 2°C | |||
|
| 10%EG | 6%DMF | 10%EG | 6%DMF | 10%EG | 6%DMF | 6%DMA |
|
| −1°C/min to −30°C | −15°C/min to −30°C | 4 cm above LN | directly into | |||
| −30°C/min to −60°C | −30°C/min to −60°C | (120°C for 3 min) | LN | ||||
Figure 1Quality of frozen/thawed spermatozoa in the different protocols.
Figure 2Survival rate of live, intact spermatozoa after various freezing methods.
Figure 3Fertility and embryo mortality in the three experimental groups following the artificial inseminations.