Literature DB >> 23658545

Fractal analyses: statistical and methodological innovations and best practices.

John G Holden1, Michael A Riley, Jianbo Gao, Kjerstin Torre.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 23658545      PMCID: PMC3647382          DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2013.00097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Physiol        ISSN: 1664-042X            Impact factor:   4.566


× No keyword cloud information.
Fractal statistics now routinely appear in the scientific literature. Examples originate from many disciplines, including aquatic sciences, biology, computer science, ecology, economics, geology, mathematics, medicine, neuroscience, physics, physiology, and psychology. This eBook provides a broad range of resources to support the application of fractal methods and theory in physiology and related disciplines. It is comprised of a set of research topic articles that appeared in the Frontiers in Physiology specialty section: Fractal Physiology. Our eBook chapters are organized along a loose continuum defined by the characteristics of the empirical measurements a given statistical technique is intended to confront. At one end of the continuum are techniques designed for application to stochastic systems. van Rooij et al. (2013) describe histograms, probability distributions, and scaling distributions in fractal terms. The next step on the continuum concerns self-affine random fractals and methods intended for outcome measures that entail scale-invariant 1/f patterns or related patterns of temporal fluctuation. Stadnitski (2012) overviews several statistical procedures available for the analysis of fractal time-series measurements. Riley et al. (2012) discuss an adaptive fractal analysis that broadens the potential range of bio-signals that can be understood from a fractal perspective. Likewise, Marmelat et al. (2012) illustrate a relative roughness scale, helpful in determining the applicability of a monofractal description to a given signal. Wijnants et al. (2013) examines how of signal sampling rate artifacts influence spectrally derived scaling exponents. Hasselman (2013) discusses relationships among a set of common fractal time-series analyses, and advocates reliance on theory-driven predictions as a route to understanding the systems that yield empirical patterns. Eke et al. (2012) bridge the monofractal and multifractal frameworks with a special emphasis on the appropriate and accurate characterization of measured signals. Ihlen (2012) supplies a detailed tutorial on multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis. The deterministic end of the statistical continuum emphasizes techniques used to investigate systems that express differentiable trajectories. Webber (2012) illustrates recurrence analysis on time-series derived from several multi-dimensional dynamic systems. Gao et al. (2012) introduces a very general analysis that is suitable for use on both stochastic and continuous measurements. Finally, Richardson et al. (2012) describe techniques that assess relative dynamic synchrony among multiple coupled oscillatory time-series. Taken together, the chapters offer a gamut of analytic strategies alongside contemporary expertise on how to best conduct and interpret the outcomes of fractal analyses.
  11 in total

1.  Multiscale analysis of biological data by scale-dependent lyapunov exponent.

Authors:  Jianbo Gao; Jing Hu; Wen-Wen Tung; Erik Blasch
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 4.566

2.  Relative roughness: an index for testing the suitability of the monofractal model.

Authors:  Vivien Marmelat; Kjerstin Torre; Didier Delignières
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 4.566

3.  Recurrence quantification of fractal structures.

Authors:  Charles L Webber
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  Measuring fractality.

Authors:  Tatjana Stadnitski
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Measuring group synchrony: a cluster-phase method for analyzing multivariate movement time-series.

Authors:  Michael J Richardson; Randi L Garcia; Till D Frank; Madison Gergor; Kerry L Marsh
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  A tutorial introduction to adaptive fractal analysis.

Authors:  Michael A Riley; Scott Bonnette; Nikita Kuznetsov; Sebastian Wallot; Jianbo Gao
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  A fractal approach to dynamic inference and distribution analysis.

Authors:  Marieke M J W van Rooij; Bertha A Nash; Srinivasan Rajaraman; John G Holden
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Pitfalls in Fractal Time Series Analysis: fMRI BOLD as an Exemplary Case.

Authors:  Andras Eke; Peter Herman; Basavaraju G Sanganahalli; Fahmeed Hyder; Peter Mukli; Zoltan Nagy
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  When the blind curve is finite: dimension estimation and model inference based on empirical waveforms.

Authors:  Fred Hasselman
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Does sample rate introduce an artifact in spectral analysis of continuous processes?

Authors:  Maarten L Wijnants; R F A Cox; F Hasselman; A M T Bosman; Guy Van Orden
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 4.566

View more
  4 in total

1.  Intra-individual variability and continuity of action and perception measures in infants.

Authors:  Anja Gampe; Anne Keitel; Moritz M Daum
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-03-25

Review 2.  The Embodiment of Objects: Review, Analysis, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Aubrie Schettler; Vicente Raja; Michael L Anderson
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 4.677

3.  Behavioral Priming 2.0: Enter a Dynamical Systems Perspective.

Authors:  Dario Krpan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-07-18

4.  Fractal Analysis of BOLD Time Series in a Network Associated With Waiting Impulsivity.

Authors:  Atae Akhrif; Marcel Romanos; Katharina Domschke; Angelika Schmitt-Boehrer; Susanne Neufang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 4.566

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.