BACKGROUND: Investigations of age effects on youth anxiety outcomes in randomized trials (RCTs) of cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) have failed to yield a clear result due to inadequate statistical power and methodologic weaknesses. We conducted an individual patient data metaanalysis to address this gap. QUESTION: Does age moderate CBT effect size, measured by a clinically and statistically significant interaction between age and CBT exposure? METHODS: All English language RCTs of CBT for anxiety in 6-19 year olds were identified using systematic review methods. Investigators of eligible trials were invited to submit their individual patient data. The anxiety disorder interview schedule (ADIS) primary diagnosis severity score was the primary outcome. Age effects were investigated using multilevel modeling to account for study level data clustering and random effects. RESULTS: Data from 17 of 23 eligible trials were obtained (74%); 16 studies and 1,171 (78%) cases were available for the analysis. No interaction between age and CBT exposure was found in a model containing age, sex, ADIS baseline severity score, and comorbid depression diagnosis (power ≥ 80%). Sensitivity analyses, including modeling age as both a categorical and continuous variable, revealed this result was robust. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents who receive CBT in efficacy research studies show benefits comparable to younger children. However, CBT protocol modifications routinely carried out by expert trial therapists may explain these findings. Adolescent CBT protocols are needed to facilitate the transportability of efficacy research effects to usual care settings where therapists may have less opportunity for CBT training and expertise development.
BACKGROUND: Investigations of age effects on youth anxiety outcomes in randomized trials (RCTs) of cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) have failed to yield a clear result due to inadequate statistical power and methodologic weaknesses. We conducted an individual patient data metaanalysis to address this gap. QUESTION: Does age moderate CBT effect size, measured by a clinically and statistically significant interaction between age and CBT exposure? METHODS: All English language RCTs of CBT for anxiety in 6-19 year olds were identified using systematic review methods. Investigators of eligible trials were invited to submit their individual patient data. The anxiety disorder interview schedule (ADIS) primary diagnosis severity score was the primary outcome. Age effects were investigated using multilevel modeling to account for study level data clustering and random effects. RESULTS: Data from 17 of 23 eligible trials were obtained (74%); 16 studies and 1,171 (78%) cases were available for the analysis. No interaction between age and CBT exposure was found in a model containing age, sex, ADIS baseline severity score, and comorbid depression diagnosis (power ≥ 80%). Sensitivity analyses, including modeling age as both a categorical and continuous variable, revealed this result was robust. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents who receive CBT in efficacy research studies show benefits comparable to younger children. However, CBT protocol modifications routinely carried out by expert trial therapists may explain these findings. Adolescent CBT protocols are needed to facilitate the transportability of efficacy research effects to usual care settings where therapists may have less opportunity for CBT training and expertise development.
Authors: Sara T Brookes; Elise Whitely; Matthias Egger; George Davey Smith; Paul A Mulheran; Tim J Peters Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Ronald C Kessler; Patricia Berglund; Olga Demler; Robert Jin; Kathleen R Merikangas; Ellen E Walters Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2005-06
Authors: Denise H M Bodden; Susan M Bögels; Maaike H Nauta; Else De Haan; Jaap Ringrose; Carla Appelboom; Andries G Brinkman; Karen C M M J Appelboom-Geerts Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Maaike H Nauta; Agnes Scholing; Paul M G Emmelkamp; Ruud B Minderaa Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Charlotte Waddell; David R Offord; Cody A Shepherd; Josephine M Hua; Kimberley McEwan Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: Scott N Compton; John T Walkup; Anne Marie Albano; John C Piacentini; Boris Birmaher; Joel T Sherrill; Golda S Ginsburg; Moira A Rynn; James T McCracken; Bruce D Waslick; Satish Iyengar; Phillip C Kendall; John S March Journal: Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health Date: 2010-01-05 Impact factor: 3.033
Authors: Jerome H Taylor; Eli R Lebowitz; Ewgeni Jakubovski; Catherine G Coughlin; Wendy K Silverman; Michael H Bloch Journal: J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol Date: 2017-09-28
Authors: David Heyne; Floor M Sauter; Thomas H Ollendick; Brigit M Van Widenfelt; P Michiel Westenberg Journal: Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev Date: 2014-06
Authors: Meredith L Wallace; Dana L McMakin; Patricia Z Tan; Dana Rosen; Erika E Forbes; Cecile D Ladouceur; Neal D Ryan; Greg J Siegle; Ronald E Dahl; Philip C Kendall; Anthony Mannarino; Jennifer S Silk Journal: Behav Res Ther Date: 2016-12-18
Authors: Hiran Thabrew; Karolina Stasiak; Sarah E Hetrick; Stephen Wong; Jessica H Huss; Sally N Merry Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-08-15