PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of transarterial embolization of life-threatening arterial rupture in patients with vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (vEDS) in a single tertiary referral center. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed transarterial embolization for vEDS performed at our institution from 2000 to 2012. The indication of embolization was spontaneous arterial rupture or pseudoaneurysm with acute bleeding. All interventions used a percutaneous approach through a 5F or less introducer sheath. Embolic agents were microcoils and glue in 3 procedures, glue alone in 2, and microcoils alone in 2. RESULTS: Five consecutive vEDS patients were treated by 7 embolization procedures (4 women, mean age 29.8 years). All procedures were successfully performed. Two patients required a second procedure for newly arterial lesions at a different site from the first procedure. Four of the five patients were still alive after a mean follow-up of 19.4 (range 1-74.7) months. One patient died of multiple organ failure 2 days after procedure. Minor procedural complications were observed in 3 procedures (43 %), all directly managed during the same session. Remote arterial lesions occurred after 3 procedures (43 %); one underwent a second embolization, and the other 2 were observed conservatively. Puncture site complication was observed in only one procedure (14 %). CONCLUSION: Embolization for vEDS is a safe and effective method to manage life-threatening arterial rupture.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of transarterial embolization of life-threatening arterial rupture in patients with vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (vEDS) in a single tertiary referral center. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed transarterial embolization for vEDS performed at our institution from 2000 to 2012. The indication of embolization was spontaneous arterial rupture or pseudoaneurysm with acute bleeding. All interventions used a percutaneous approach through a 5F or less introducer sheath. Embolic agents were microcoils and glue in 3 procedures, glue alone in 2, and microcoils alone in 2. RESULTS: Five consecutive vEDS patients were treated by 7 embolization procedures (4 women, mean age 29.8 years). All procedures were successfully performed. Two patients required a second procedure for newly arterial lesions at a different site from the first procedure. Four of the five patients were still alive after a mean follow-up of 19.4 (range 1-74.7) months. One patient died of multiple organ failure 2 days after procedure. Minor procedural complications were observed in 3 procedures (43 %), all directly managed during the same session. Remote arterial lesions occurred after 3 procedures (43 %); one underwent a second embolization, and the other 2 were observed conservatively. Puncture site complication was observed in only one procedure (14 %). CONCLUSION: Embolization for vEDS is a safe and effective method to manage life-threatening arterial rupture.
Authors: Sherene Shalhub; Peter H Byers; Kelli L Hicks; Kristofer Charlton-Ouw; Devin Zarkowsky; Dawn M Coleman; Frank M Davis; Ellen S Regalado; Giovanni De Caridi; K Nicole Weaver; Erin M Miller; Marc L Schermerhorn; Katie Shean; Gustavo Oderich; Mauricio Ribeiro; Cole Nishikawa; Christian-Alexander Behrendt; E Sebastian Debus; Yskert von Kodolitsch; Richard J Powell; Melanie Pepin; Dianna M Milewicz; Peter F Lawrence; Karen Woo Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2019-05-21 Impact factor: 4.268