Justin C Brown1, Gabriella M John, Saya Segal, Christina S Chu, Kathryn H Schmitz. 1. 1Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; 2Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University, New York, NY; 3Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ; and 4Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Physical activity (PA) is known to provide physical and mental health benefits to uterine cancer survivors. However, it is unknown if PA is associated with lower limb lymphedema (LLL), an accumulation of protein-rich fluid in the lower limbs. Therefore, we sought to examine the association between PA and LLL in uterine cancer survivors, with a focus on walking. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study using mailed surveys among uterine cancer survivors who received care at a university-based cancer center. We asked about PA, walking, and LLL symptoms using validated self-report questionnaires. PA was calculated using MET-hours per week, and walking was calculated using blocks per day. RESULTS: The response rate to our survey was 43%. Among the 213 uterine cancer survivors in our survey, 36% were classified as having LLL. Compared with participants who reported <3 MET · h · wk of PA, participants who reported ≥ 18.0 MET · h · wk of PA had an odds ratio of LLL of 0.32 (95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.69; P trend = 0.003). Stratified analyses suggested the association between PA and LLL existed only among women with body mass index (BMI) <30 kg · m (P trend = 0.007) compared with women with BMI ≥ 30 kg · m (P trend = 0.47). Compared with participants who reported <4.0 blocks per day of walking, participants who reported ≥ 12 blocks per day of walking had an odds ratio of LLL of 0.19 (95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.43; P trend < 0.0001). Stratified analyses suggested the association between walking and LLL was similar among women with BMI <30 kg · m (P trend = 0.007) and women with BMI ≥ 30 kg · m (P trend = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Participation in higher levels of PA or walking is associated with reduced proportions of LLL in dose-response fashion. These findings should be interpreted as preliminary and should be investigated in future studies.
PURPOSE: Physical activity (PA) is known to provide physical and mental health benefits to uterine cancer survivors. However, it is unknown if PA is associated with lower limb lymphedema (LLL), an accumulation of protein-rich fluid in the lower limbs. Therefore, we sought to examine the association between PA and LLL in uterine cancer survivors, with a focus on walking. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study using mailed surveys among uterine cancer survivors who received care at a university-based cancer center. We asked about PA, walking, and LLL symptoms using validated self-report questionnaires. PA was calculated using MET-hours per week, and walking was calculated using blocks per day. RESULTS: The response rate to our survey was 43%. Among the 213 uterine cancer survivors in our survey, 36% were classified as having LLL. Compared with participants who reported <3 MET · h · wk of PA, participants who reported ≥ 18.0 MET · h · wk of PA had an odds ratio of LLL of 0.32 (95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.69; P trend = 0.003). Stratified analyses suggested the association between PA and LLL existed only among women with body mass index (BMI) <30 kg · m (P trend = 0.007) compared with women with BMI ≥ 30 kg · m (P trend = 0.47). Compared with participants who reported <4.0 blocks per day of walking, participants who reported ≥ 12 blocks per day of walking had an odds ratio of LLL of 0.19 (95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.43; P trend < 0.0001). Stratified analyses suggested the association between walking and LLL was similar among women with BMI <30 kg · m (P trend = 0.007) and women with BMI ≥ 30 kg · m (P trend = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Participation in higher levels of PA or walking is associated with reduced proportions of LLL in dose-response fashion. These findings should be interpreted as preliminary and should be investigated in future studies.
Authors: Kathryn H Schmitz; Andrea B Troxel; Andrea Cheville; Lorita L Grant; Cathy J Bryan; Cynthia R Gross; Leslie A Lytle; Rehana L Ahmed Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2009-01-08 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Mary M McDermott; Philip Ades; Jack M Guralnik; Alan Dyer; Luigi Ferrucci; Kiang Liu; Miriam Nelson; Donald Lloyd-Jones; Linda Van Horn; Daniel Garside; Melina Kibbe; Kathryn Domanchuk; James H Stein; Yihua Liao; Huimin Tao; David Green; William H Pearce; Joseph R Schneider; David McPherson; Susan T Laing; Walter J McCarthy; Adhir Shroff; Michael H Criqui Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-01-14 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Richard P Troiano; David Berrigan; Kevin W Dodd; Louise C Mâsse; Timothy Tilert; Margaret McDowell Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Kathryn H Schmitz; Rehana L Ahmed; Andrea Troxel; Andrea Cheville; Rebecca Smith; Lorita Lewis-Grant; Cathy J Bryan; Catherine T Williams-Smith; Quincy P Greene Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-08-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Justin C Brown; Lilie L Lin; Saya Segal; Christina S Chu; Ashley E Haggerty; Emily M Ko; Kathryn H Schmitz Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-06-07 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Crystal S Denlinger; Tara Sanft; K Scott Baker; Gregory Broderick; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Debra L Friedman; Mindy Goldman; Melissa Hudson; Nazanin Khakpour; Allison King; Divya Koura; Robin M Lally; Terry S Langbaum; Allison L McDonough; Michelle Melisko; Jose G Montoya; Kathi Mooney; Javid J Moslehi; Tracey O'Connor; Linda Overholser; Electra D Paskett; Jeffrey Peppercorn; William Pirl; M Alma Rodriguez; Kathryn J Ruddy; Paula Silverman; Sophia Smith; Karen L Syrjala; Amye Tevaarwerk; Susan G Urba; Mark T Wakabayashi; Phyllis Zee; Nicole R McMillian; Deborah A Freedman-Cass Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Simona F Shaitelman; Kate D Cromwell; John C Rasmussen; Nicole L Stout; Jane M Armer; Bonnie B Lasinski; Janice N Cormier Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2014-11-19 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Crystal S Denlinger; Jennifer A Ligibel; Madhuri Are; K Scott Baker; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Don Dizon; Debra L Friedman; Mindy Goldman; Lee Jones; Allison King; Grace H Ku; Elizabeth Kvale; Terry S Langbaum; Kristin Leonardi-Warren; Mary S McCabe; Michelle Melisko; Jose G Montoya; Kathi Mooney; Mary Ann Morgan; Javid J Moslehi; Tracey O'Connor; Linda Overholser; Electra D Paskett; Jeffrey Peppercorn; Muhammad Raza; M Alma Rodriguez; Karen L Syrjala; Susan G Urba; Mark T Wakabayashi; Phyllis Zee; Nicole R McMillian; Deborah A Freedman-Cass Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Shirin M Shallwani; Anna Towers; Anne Newman; Shannon Salvador; Angela Yung; Lucy Gilbert; Walter H Gotlieb; Xing Zeng; Doneal Thomas Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2021-01-13 Impact factor: 3.677