Literature DB >> 23657140

Blood volume determination, a nuclear medicine test in evolution.

Donald Margouleff1.   

Abstract

The method for determining blood volume has evolved substantially since first attempts were made in the latter part of the nineteenth century with the exsanguination of animals. The now accepted methods are based on indicator dilution methodologies. First attempts utilized inert dyes such as Evans Blue and Cardiogreen. These were found to be impractical due, primarily, to their rapid clearance from the blood. For many years, the most accepted method for blood volume determination was the dual isotope technique. This procedure utilizes chromium 51 or 99mTc to label autologous red cells and radioiodine 125 or 131 to label human serum albumin (HSA). Plasma and red cell volumes are measured separately and the results "combined". The procedure requires on-site labeling of autologous red cells and HSA, and meticulous preparation of standards and doses. The complexity of this method leads to performance times of 6 to 8 hours. An FDA-approved single isotope method is now employed in over 60 major institutions. HSA is labeled with radioiodine 131 at an FDA radiopharmaceutical facility, and test doses and standards are provided to laboratories in kit form. The red cell volume is derived by a calculation utilizing the measured plasma volume and the value for the average whole-body hematocrit. All calculations are carried out by a dedicated microprocessor, and a final report is generated and printed. The results are compared with predicted normal values for male and female patients based on percentage deviation from normal weight. Preliminary results are available in 30 minutes and complete calculations in 90 minutes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23657140     DOI: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e318292f370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0363-9762            Impact factor:   7.794


  7 in total

1.  Dose correction for post-contrast T1 mapping of the heart: the MESA study.

Authors:  Neville D Gai; Veit Sandfort; Songtao Liu; João A C Lima; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Potential Applications of Using 68Ga-Evans Blue PET/CT in the Evaluation of Lymphatic Disorder: Preliminary Observations.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Peilin Wu; Fang Li; Guansheng Tong; Xiaoyuan Chen; Zhaohui Zhu
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 7.794

Review 3.  Evans Blue Dye: A Revisit of Its Applications in Biomedicine.

Authors:  Linpeng Yao; Xing Xue; Peipei Yu; Yicheng Ni; Feng Chen
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-04-22       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 4.  Extracorporeal Ultrafiltration for Fluid Overload in Heart Failure: Current Status and Prospects for Further Research.

Authors:  Maria Rosa Costanzo; Claudio Ronco; William T Abraham; Piergiuseppe Agostoni; Jonathan Barasch; Gregg C Fonarow; Stephen S Gottlieb; Brian E Jaski; Amir Kazory; Allison P Levin; Howard R Levin; Giancarlo Marenzi; Wilfried Mullens; Dan Negoianu; Margaret M Redfield; W H Wilson Tang; Jeffrey M Testani; Adriaan A Voors
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 5.  Ultrafiltration in Acute Heart Failure.

Authors:  Maria Rosa Costanzo
Journal:  Card Fail Rev       Date:  2019-02

Review 6.  Markers for blood-brain barrier integrity: how appropriate is Evans blue in the twenty-first century and what are the alternatives?

Authors:  Norman R Saunders; Katarzyna M Dziegielewska; Kjeld Møllgård; Mark D Habgood
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Blood volume measurement using cardiovascular magnetic resonance and ferumoxytol: preclinical validation.

Authors:  Rajiv Ramasawmy; Toby Rogers; Miguel A Alcantar; Delaney R McGuirt; Jaffar M Khan; Peter Kellman; Hui Xue; Anthony Z Faranesh; Adrienne E Campbell-Washburn; Robert J Lederman; Daniel A Herzka
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 5.364

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.