Literature DB >> 23656489

Effects of providing patient progress feedback and clinical support tools to psychotherapists in an inpatient eating disorders treatment program: a randomized controlled study.

Witold Simon1, Michael J Lambert, Gregory Busath, Aaron Vazquez, Arjan Berkeljon, Kevin Hyer, Mac Granley, Michael Berrett.   

Abstract

Research on the effects of progress feedback and clinician problem-solving tools on patient outcome has been limited to a few clinical problems and settings (Shimokawa, Lambert, & Smart, 2010). Although these interventions work well in outpatient settings their effects so far have not been investigated with eating-disordered patients or in inpatient care. In this study, the effect of providing feedback interventions was investigated in a randomized clinical trial involving 133 females diagnosed with anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, or eating disorders not otherwise specified. Comparisons were made between the outcomes of patients randomly assigned to either treatment-as-usual (TAU) or an experimental condition (Fb) within therapists (the same therapists provided both treatments). Patients in the Fb condition more frequently experienced clinically significant change than those who had TAU (52.95% vs. 28.6%). Similar trends were noted within diagnostic groups. In terms of pre to post change in mental health functioning, large effect sizes favored Fb over TAU. Patients' BMI improved substantially in both TAU and the feedback condition. The effects of feedback were consistent with past research on these approaches although the effect size was smaller in this study. Suggestions for further research are delineated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23656489     DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2013.787497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychother Res        ISSN: 1050-3307


  7 in total

1.  The effectiveness of clinician feedback in the treatment of depression in the community mental health system.

Authors:  Mary Beth Connolly Gibbons; John E Kurtz; Donald L Thompson; Rachel A Mack; Jacqueline K Lee; Aileen Rothbard; Susan V Eisen; Robert Gallop; Paul Crits-Christoph
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2015-06-08

Review 2.  Routine use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for improving treatment of common mental health disorders in adults.

Authors:  Tony Kendrick; Magdy El-Gohary; Beth Stuart; Simon Gilbody; Rachel Churchill; Laura Aiken; Abhishek Bhattacharya; Amy Gimson; Anna L Brütt; Kim de Jong; Michael Moore
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-07-13

3.  Feedback versus no feedback in improving patient outcome in group psychotherapy for eating disorders (F-EAT): protocol for a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Annika Helgadóttir Davidsen; Stig Poulsen; Mette Waaddegaard; Jane Lindschou; Marianne Lau
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Challenges in the Implementation of Measurement Feedback Systems.

Authors:  Kim de Jong
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2016-05

Review 5.  Feedback from Outcome Measures and Treatment Effectiveness, Treatment Efficiency, and Collaborative Practice: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Dawid Gondek; Julian Edbrooke-Childs; Elian Fink; Jessica Deighton; Miranda Wolpert
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2016-05

6.  Development and Psychometric Validation of the EDE-QS, a 12 Item Short Form of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q).

Authors:  Nicole Gideon; Nick Hawkes; Jonathan Mond; Rob Saunders; Kate Tchanturia; Lucy Serpell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Psychotherapeutic Treatment for Anorexia Nervosa: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Almut Zeeck; Beate Herpertz-Dahlmann; Hans-Christoph Friederich; Timo Brockmeyer; Gaby Resmark; Ulrich Hagenah; Stefan Ehrlich; Ulrich Cuntz; Stephan Zipfel; Armin Hartmann
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.157

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.