Literature DB >> 23656430

Global coherence in younger and older adults: Influence of cognitive processes and discourse type.

Heather Harris Wright1, Anthony D Koutsoftas, Gilson J Capilouto, Gerasimos Fergadiotis.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present research was to examine the influence of cognitive processes on discourse global coherence ability measured across different discourse tasks and collected from younger (n = 40; 20-39 years) and older (n = 40; 70-87 years) cognitively healthy adults. Study participants produced oral language samples in response to five commonly used discourse elicitation tasks and they were analyzed for maintenance of global coherence. Participants also completed memory and attention measures. Group differences on the global coherence scale were found for only one type of discourse-recounts. Across discourse elicitation tasks the lowest global coherence scores were found for recounts compared to the other discourse elicitation tasks. The influence of cognitive processes on maintenance of global coherence differed for the two age groups. For the younger group, there were no observed significant relationships. For the older group, cognitive measures were related to global coherence of stories and procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23656430      PMCID: PMC3748174          DOI: 10.1080/13825585.2013.794894

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn        ISSN: 1382-5585


  20 in total

1.  The effect of elicitation task on discourse coherence and cohesion in adolescents with brain injury.

Authors:  E Van Leer; L Turkstra
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.288

2.  Age-related differences in the production of textual descriptions.

Authors:  Andrea Marini; Anke Boewe; Carlo Caltagirone; Sergio Carlomagno
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2005-09

3.  Trying to tell a tale: discourse impairments in progressive aphasia and frontotemporal dementia.

Authors:  S Ash; P Moore; S Antani; G McCawley; M Work; M Grossman
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Building coherence: A framework for exploring the breakdown of links across clause boundaries in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Tali Ditman; Gina R Kuperberg
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 1.710

5.  Discourse coherence and cognition after stroke: a dual task study.

Authors:  Yvonne Rogalski; Lori J P Altmann; Prudence Plummer-D'Amato; Andrea L Behrman; Michael Marsiske
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 2.288

6.  A system for quantifying the informativeness and efficiency of the connected speech of adults with aphasia.

Authors:  L E Nicholas; R H Brookshire
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1993-04

7.  Quantifying incoherence in speech: an automated methodology and novel application to schizophrenia.

Authors:  Brita Elvevåg; Peter W Foltz; Daniel R Weinberger; Terry E Goldberg
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2007-04-16       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Story processing ability in cognitively healthy younger and older adults.

Authors:  Heather Harris Wright; Gilson J Capilouto; Cidambi Srinivasan; Gerasimos Fergadiotis
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Left and right hemispheric contributions to discourse coherence and cohesion.

Authors:  R L Bloom; J C Borod; C Santschi-Haywood; L H Pick; L K Obler
Journal:  Int J Neurosci       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.292

10.  Considering a multi-level approach to understanding maintenance of global coherence in adults with aphasia.

Authors:  Heather Harris Wright; Gilson J Capilouto
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 2.773

View more
  14 in total

1.  Neural organization of speech production: A lesion-based study of error patterns in connected speech.

Authors:  Brielle C Stark; Alexandra Basilakos; Gregory Hickok; Chris Rorden; Leonardo Bonilha; Julius Fridriksson
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 4.027

2.  The cognitive and neural underpinnings of discourse coherence in post-stroke aphasia.

Authors:  Reem S W Alyahya; Matthew A Lambon Ralph; Ajay Halai; Paul Hoffman
Journal:  Brain Commun       Date:  2022-06-14

3.  Assessing Language in Unstructured Conversation in People With Aphasia: Methods, Psychometric Integrity, Normative Data, and Comparison to a Structured Narrative Task.

Authors:  Marion C Leaman; Lisa A Edmonds
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 2.674

4.  Considering a multi-level approach to understanding maintenance of global coherence in adults with aphasia.

Authors:  Heather Harris Wright; Gilson J Capilouto
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 2.773

5.  A Comparison of Three Discourse Elicitation Methods in Aphasia and Age-Matched Adults: Implications for Language Assessment and Outcome.

Authors:  Brielle C Stark
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Poor coherence in older people's speech is explained by impaired semantic and executive processes.

Authors:  Paul Hoffman; Ekaterina Loginova; Asatta Russell
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 8.713

7.  Age-related differences in conversational discourse abilities A comparative study.

Authors:  Natalie Pereira; Ana Paula Bresolin Gonçalves; Mariana Goulart; Marina Amarante Tarrasconi; Renata Kochhann; Rochele Paz Fonseca
Journal:  Dement Neuropsychol       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar

8.  The relationship between trained ratings and untrained listeners' judgments of global coherence in extended monologues.

Authors:  Yvonne Rogalski; Sarah Key-DeLyria; Sarah Mucci; Jonathan Wilson; Lori J P Altmann
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 2.773

9.  Reductions in prefrontal activation predict off-topic utterances during speech production.

Authors:  Paul Hoffman
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Discourse Measures to Differentiate Between Mild Cognitive Impairment and Healthy Aging.

Authors:  Bo Seon Kim; Yong Bum Kim; HyangHee Kim
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 5.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.