Literature DB >> 23656381

Roles and identities in transition: boundaries of work and inter-professional relationships at the interface between telehealth and primary care.

Julia Segar1, Anne Rogers, Chris Salisbury, Clare Thomas.   

Abstract

Shifting the balance of care towards home and community is viewed as requiring interventions which enhance or complement primary care. Technology-based interventions are seen as key to the future in this work. Telehealthcare implicates a new agenda for inter-professional working across boundaries of healthcare. One such interface is between telehealthcare professionals and professionals located in primary care. This study reports the findings from a qualitative study forming part of a broader project examining the potential of developing and implementing telehealth interventions to support patients with long-term conditions. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with telehealth nurse care managers, practice nurses and general practitioners in their respective work settings (39 interviews with 62 participants). Observation was undertaken at a telehealth call centre. The research took place between April 2010 and March 2011. Thematic analysis of qualitative data was undertaken. Telehealth nurse care managers' interviews suggested narrative constructions of new roles and identities to fit telehealth work, combining a holistic ideal and retro-appeal with 'traditional' values of nursing, which distinguished and distanced them from counterparts in general practices. Practice nurses and general practitioners were ambivalent and often sceptical about the contribution of telehealth to long-term condition work. Practice nurses' accounts suggested a sense of protectiveness about maintaining boundaries around established remits of managing long-term conditions; general practitioners, having devolved much of the care of long-term conditions to nurses, were keen to retain their positions as gatekeepers to resources. Perceptions of shifts of professional roles, new ways of working and how they are valued form a relevant contextual element to the introduction of telehealth interventions. A pre-emptive view and response to how professionals understand and approach increasingly complex and multi-faceted roles within primary care is likely to prepare and facilitate the introduction and integration of telehealth innovations into existing patient services.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  long-term conditions; primary care; professional roles; qualitative research; telehealth; telehealthcare

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23656381     DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Soc Care Community        ISSN: 0966-0410


  22 in total

1.  Experiences of front-line health professionals in the delivery of telehealth: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Virginia MacNeill; Caroline Sanders; Ray Fitzpatrick; Jane Hendy; James Barlow; Martin Knapp; Anne Rogers; Martin Bardsley; Stanton P Newman
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Self Management and Telehealth: Lessons Learnt from the Evaluation of a Dorset Telehealth Program.

Authors:  Carol S Bond; Louise Worswick
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 3.  Smartphone Applications Designed to Improve Older People's Chronic Pain Management: An Integrated Systematic Review.

Authors:  Margaret Dunham; Antonio Bonacaro; Patricia Schofield; Liz Bacon; Fotios Spyridonis; Hadi Mehrpouya
Journal:  Geriatrics (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-08

Review 4.  Assessing the implementability of telehealth interventions for self-management support: a realist review.

Authors:  Ivaylo Vassilev; Alison Rowsell; Catherine Pope; Anne Kennedy; Alicia O'Cathain; Chris Salisbury; Anne Rogers
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 7.327

5.  The Contradictions of Telehealth User Experience in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis.

Authors:  Lisa Brunton; Peter Bower; Caroline Sanders
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  TElehealth in CHronic disease: mixed-methods study to develop the TECH conceptual model for intervention design and evaluation.

Authors:  Chris Salisbury; Clare Thomas; Alicia O'Cathain; Anne Rogers; Catherine Pope; Lucy Yardley; Sandra Hollinghurst; Tom Fahey; Glyn Lewis; Shirley Large; Louisa Edwards; Alison Rowsell; Julia Segar; Simon Brownsell; Alan A Montgomery
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Cost-effectiveness of telehealth for patients with depression: evidence from the Healthlines randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Padraig Dixon; Sandra Hollinghurst; Louisa Edwards; Clare Thomas; Alexis Foster; Ben Davies; Daisy Gaunt; Alan A Montgomery; Chris Salisbury
Journal:  BJPsych Open       Date:  2016-08-09

8.  Exploring the views of GPs, people with dementia and their carers on assistive technology: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Lisa Newton; Claire Dickinson; Grant Gibson; Katie Brittain; Louise Robinson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a telehealth intervention to support the management of long-term conditions: study protocol for two linked randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Clare L Thomas; Mei-See Man; Alicia O'Cathain; Sandra Hollinghurst; Shirley Large; Louisa Edwards; Jon Nicholl; Alan A Montgomery; Chris Salisbury
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Telehealth for patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease: pragmatic randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Chris Salisbury; Alicia O'Cathain; Clare Thomas; Louisa Edwards; Daisy Gaunt; Padraig Dixon; Sandra Hollinghurst; Jon Nicholl; Shirley Large; Lucy Yardley; Tom Fahey; Alexis Foster; Katy Garner; Kimberley Horspool; Mei-See Man; Anne Rogers; Catherine Pope; Alan A Montgomery
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.