BACKGROUND: Impairment of cardiac sympathetic activity has various detrimental effects on cardiac function. The purpose was to investigate the relationship between left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony and cardiac sympathetic activity in non-ischemic heart failure (HF). METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with non-ischemic HF were enrolled. Cardiac sympathetic activity was assessed by heart-to-mediastinum ratio (H/M ratio) on (123)I-Metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy. LV dyssynchrony was assessed by cross-correlation analysis of time curves of myocardial circumferential strains delivered from cine-tagging MR images. Temporal dyssynchrony was defined as contraction delay between septal and lateral segments >110 milliseconds. Spatial dyssynchrony was defined as the negative value of the maximum correlation for the two strain time curves. RESULTS: H/M ratio was significantly lower for patients with spatial dyssynchrony compared to patients without (1.8 ± 0.3 vs 2.1 ± 0.3, P < .05). There was no difference between patients with and without temporal dyssynchrony (2.0 ± 0.2 vs 2.0 ± 0.3). The incidence of spatial dyssynchrony was significantly higher in patients with H/M ratio <2.0 than those whose ratios were ≥2.0 (75% vs 20%, P = .001). There was no difference in the incidence of temporal dyssynchrony between the two groups (17% vs 20%). CONCLUSION: Impairment of cardiac sympathetic activity was found to be associated with spatial dyssynchrony in patients with non-ischemic HF.
BACKGROUND: Impairment of cardiac sympathetic activity has various detrimental effects on cardiac function. The purpose was to investigate the relationship between left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony and cardiac sympathetic activity in non-ischemic heart failure (HF). METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with non-ischemic HF were enrolled. Cardiac sympathetic activity was assessed by heart-to-mediastinum ratio (H/M ratio) on (123)I-Metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy. LV dyssynchrony was assessed by cross-correlation analysis of time curves of myocardial circumferential strains delivered from cine-tagging MR images. Temporal dyssynchrony was defined as contraction delay between septal and lateral segments >110 milliseconds. Spatial dyssynchrony was defined as the negative value of the maximum correlation for the two strain time curves. RESULTS: H/M ratio was significantly lower for patients with spatial dyssynchrony compared to patients without (1.8 ± 0.3 vs 2.1 ± 0.3, P < .05). There was no difference between patients with and without temporal dyssynchrony (2.0 ± 0.2 vs 2.0 ± 0.3). The incidence of spatial dyssynchrony was significantly higher in patients with H/M ratio <2.0 than those whose ratios were ≥2.0 (75% vs 20%, P = .001). There was no difference in the incidence of temporal dyssynchrony between the two groups (17% vs 20%). CONCLUSION: Impairment of cardiac sympathetic activity was found to be associated with spatial dyssynchrony in patients with non-ischemic HF.
Authors: William T Abraham; Westby G Fisher; Andrew L Smith; David B Delurgio; Angel R Leon; Evan Loh; Dusan Z Kocovic; Milton Packer; Alfredo L Clavell; David L Hayes; Myrvin Ellestad; Robin J Trupp; Jackie Underwood; Faith Pickering; Cindy Truex; Peggy McAtee; John Messenger Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-06-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Bernard J Gersh; Barry J Maron; Robert O Bonow; Joseph A Dearani; Michael A Fifer; Mark S Link; Srihari S Naidu; Rick A Nishimura; Steve R Ommen; Harry Rakowski; Christine E Seidman; Jeffrey A Towbin; James E Udelson; Clyde W Yancy Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-11-08 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: T Arts; Frits W Prinzen; T Delhaas; J R Milles; Alessandro C Rossi; Patrick Clarysse Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2010-03-22 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: P Merlet; C Benvenuti; D Moyse; F Pouillart; J L Dubois-Randé; A M Duval; D Loisance; A Castaigne; A Syrota Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1999-06 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Paul R Kalra; Rakesh Sharma; Waqar Shamim; Wolfram Doehner; Roland Wensel; Aidan P Bolger; Sabine Genth-Zotz; Mariantonietta Cicoira; Andrew J S Coats; Stefan D Anker Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: L Mestroni; B Maisch; W J McKenna; K Schwartz; P Charron; C Rocco; F Tesson; A Richter; A Wilke; M Komajda Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 1999-01 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Jeroen J Bax; Gabe B Bleeker; Thomas H Marwick; Sander G Molhoek; Eric Boersma; Paul Steendijk; Ernst E van der Wall; Martin J Schalij Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2004-11-02 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Peter M Okin; Richard B Devereux; Markku S Nieminen; Sverker Jern; Lasse Oikarinen; Matti Viitasalo; Lauri Toivonen; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Stevo Julius; Steven Snapinn; Björn Dahlöf Journal: Hypertension Date: 2004-06-01 Impact factor: 10.190