Literature DB >> 23653257

Regression modeling of the cumulative incidence function with missing causes of failure using pseudo-values.

Margarita Moreno-Betancur1, Aurélien Latouche.   

Abstract

Competing risks arise when patients may fail from several causes. Strategies for modeling event-specific quantities often assume that the cause of failure is known for all patients, but this is seldom the case. Several authors have addressed the problem of modeling the cause-specific hazard rates with missing causes of failure. In contrast, direct modeling of the cumulative incidence function has received little attention.We provide a general framework for regression modeling of this function in the missing cause setting, encompassing key models such as the Fine and Gray and additive models, by considering two extensions of the Andersen–Klein pseudo-value approach. The first extension is a novel inverse probability weighting method, whereas the second extension is based on a previously proposed multiple imputation procedure.We evaluated the gain in using these approaches with small samples in an extensive simulation study. We analyzed the data from an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group breast cancer treatment clinical trial to illustrate the practical value and ease of implementation of the proposed methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23653257     DOI: 10.1002/sim.5755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  9 in total

1.  The competing risks Cox model with auxiliary case covariates under weaker missing-at-random cause of failure.

Authors:  Daniel Nevo; Reiko Nishihara; Shuji Ogino; Molin Wang
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Multiple imputation methods for nonparametric inference on cumulative incidence with missing cause of failure.

Authors:  Minjung Lee; James J Dignam; Junhee Han
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Analysis of interval-censored competing risks data under missing causes.

Authors:  Debanjan Mitra; Ujjwal Das; Kalyan Das
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 1.416

4.  Prostate cancer: net survival and cause-specific survival rates after multiple imputation.

Authors:  Adeline Morisot; Faïza Bessaoud; Paul Landais; Xavier Rébillard; Brigitte Trétarre; Jean-Pierre Daurès
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Using expert knowledge to incorporate uncertainty in cause-of-death assignments for modeling of cause-specific mortality.

Authors:  Daniel P Walsh; Andrew S Norton; Daniel J Storm; Timothy R Van Deelen; Dennis M Heisey
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Semiparametric regression and risk prediction with competing risks data under missing cause of failure.

Authors:  Giorgos Bakoyannis; Ying Zhang; Constantin T Yiannoutsos
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2020-01-25       Impact factor: 1.588

7.  Dealing with indeterminate outcomes in antimalarial drug efficacy trials: a comparison between complete case analysis, multiple imputation and inverse probability weighting.

Authors:  Prabin Dahal; Kasia Stepniewska; Philippe J Guerin; Umberto D'Alessandro; Ric N Price; Julie A Simpson
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  Direct modeling of the crude probability of cancer death and the number of life years lost due to cancer without the need of cause of death: a pseudo-observation approach in the relative survival setting.

Authors:  Dimitra-Kleio Kipourou; Maja Pohar Perme; Bernard Rachet; Aurelien Belot
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 5.899

9.  Testing the treatment effect on competing causes of death in oncology clinical trials.

Authors:  Federico Rotolo; Stefan Michiels
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 4.615

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.