Literature DB >> 23653174

Effectiveness of blood pressure educational and evaluation program for the improvement of measurement accuracy among nurses.

Franco Rabbia1, Elisa Testa, Silvia Rabbia, Santina Praticò, Claudia Colasanto, Federica Montersino, Elena Berra, Michele Covella, Chiara Fulcheri, Silvia Di Monaco, Fabrizio Buffolo, Silvia Totaro, Franco Veglio.   

Abstract

AIM: To assess the procedure for measuring blood pressure (BP) among hospital nurses and to assess if a training program would improve technique and accuracy.
METHODS: 160 nurses from Molinette Hospital were included in the study. The program was based upon theoretical and practical lessons. It was one day long and it was held by trained nurses and physicians who have practice in the Hypertension Unit. An evaluation of nurses' measuring technique and accuracy was performed before and after the program, by using a 9-item checklist. Moreover we calculated the differences between measured and effective BP values before and after the training program.
RESULTS: At baseline evaluation, we observed inadequate performance on some points of clinical BP measurement technique, specifically: only 10% of nurses inspected the arm diameter before placing the cuff, 4% measured BP in both arms, 80% placed the head of the stethoscope under the cuff, 43% did not remove all clothing that covered the location of cuff placement, did not have the patient seat comfortably with his legs uncrossed and with his back and arms supported. After the training we found a significant improvement in the technique for all items. We didn't observe any significant difference of measurement knowledge between nurses working in different settings such as medical or surgical departments.
CONCLUSIONS: Periodical education in BP measurement may be required, and this may significantly improve the technique and consequently the accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23653174     DOI: 10.1007/s40292-013-0012-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev        ISSN: 1120-9879


  9 in total

Review 1.  Measurement of blood pressure in the office: recognizing the problem and proposing the solution.

Authors:  Martin G Myers; Marshall Godwin; Martin Dawes; Alexander Kiss; Sheldon W Tobe; Janusz Kaczorowski
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 10.190

2.  Modification of nursing students' performance in blood pressure measurement: an educational retraining programme.

Authors:  H Brokalaki; V Matziou; E Gymnopoulou; P Galanis; E Brokalaki; G Theodossiades
Journal:  Int Nurs Rev       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.871

3.  Blood pressure measurement in the community: do guidelines help?

Authors:  D Wingfield; M Pierce; M Feher
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.012

4.  Nurses' knowledge of error in blood pressure measurement technique.

Authors:  Robin S Armstrong
Journal:  Int J Nurs Pract       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.066

5.  Training and certification of blood pressure observers.

Authors:  J D Curb; D R Labarthe; S P Cooper; G R Cutter; C M Hawkins
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1983 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 10.190

6.  Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research.

Authors:  Thomas G Pickering; John E Hall; Lawrence J Appel; Bonita E Falkner; John Graves; Martha N Hill; Daniel W Jones; Theodore Kurtz; Sheldon G Sheps; Edward J Roccella
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-02-08       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Italian society of hypertension guidelines for conventional and automated blood pressure measurement in the office, at home and over 24 hours.

Authors:  Gianfranco Parati; Stefano Omboni; Paolo Palatini; Damiano Rizzoni; Grzegorz Bilo; Mariaconsuelo Valentini; Enrico Agabiti Rosei; Giuseppe Mancia
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2013-01-22

8.  Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies.

Authors:  Sarah Lewington; Robert Clarke; Nawab Qizilbash; Richard Peto; Rory Collins
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-12-14       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Nursing student compliance to standards for blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  B Bogan; S Kritzer; D Deane
Journal:  J Nurs Educ       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 1.726

  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  The ongoing saga of poor blood pressure measurement: Past, present, and future perspectives.

Authors:  Jennifer Ringrose; Raj Padwal
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 3.738

2.  Overview of blood pressure measurement by Brazilian health professionals.

Authors:  Nila L S Albuquerque; Raj Padwal; Thelma L Araujo
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  Impact of operator hearing threshold on manual blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  Abubakar Danjuma Salisu; Aminu Bakari; Hamisu Abdullahi
Journal:  Ann Afr Med       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

4.  Medical students and measuring blood pressure: Results from the American Medical Association Blood Pressure Check Challenge.

Authors:  Michael K Rakotz; Raymond R Townsend; Jianing Yang; Bruce S Alpert; Kathleen A Heneghan; Matthew Wynia; Gregory D Wozniak
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  Using web-based training to improve accuracy of blood pressure measurement among health care professionals: A randomized trial.

Authors:  Rupinder Hayer; Kate Kirley; Jordana B Cohen; Stavros Tsipas; Susan E Sutherland; Suzanne Oparil; Christina M Shay; Debbie L Cohen; Christopher Kabir; Gregory Wozniak
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Potential impact of systematic and random errors in blood pressure measurement on the prevalence of high office blood pressure in the United States.

Authors:  Swati Sakhuja; Byron C Jaeger; Oluwasegun P Akinyelure; Adam P Bress; Daichi Shimbo; Joseph E Schwartz; Shakia T Hardy; George Howard; Paul Drawz; Paul Muntner
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 3.738

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.