Literature DB >> 23653022

Internet search term affects the quality and accuracy of online information about developmental hip dysplasia.

Peter D Fabricant1, Christopher J Dy, Ronak M Patel, John S Blanco, Shevaun M Doyle.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The recent emphasis on shared decision-making has increased the role of the Internet as a readily accessible medical reference source for patients and families. However, the lack of professional review creates concern over the quality, accuracy, and readability of medical information available to patients on the Internet.
METHODS: Three Internet search engines (Google, Yahoo, and Bing) were evaluated prospectively using 3 difference search terms of varying sophistication ("congenital hip dislocation," "developmental dysplasia of the hip," and "hip dysplasia in children"). Sixty-three unique Web sites were evaluated by each of 3 surgeons (2 fellowship-trained pediatric orthopaedic attendings and 1 orthopaedic chief resident) for quality and accuracy using a set of scoring criteria based on the AAOS/POSNA patient education Web site. The readability (literacy grade level) of each Web site was assessed using the Fleisch-Kincaid score.
RESULTS: There were significant differences noted in quality, accuracy, and readability of information depending on the search term used. The search term "developmental dysplasia of the hip" provided higher quality and accuracy compared with the search term "congenital hip dislocation." Of the 63 total Web sites, 1 (1.6%) was below the sixth grade reading level recommended by the NIH for health education materials and 8 (12.7%) Web sites were below the average American reading level (eighth grade).
CONCLUSIONS: The quality and accuracy of information available on the Internet regarding developmental hip dysplasia significantly varied with the search term used. Patients seeking information about DDH on the Internet may not understand the materials found because nearly all of the Web sites are written at a level above that recommended for publically distributed health information. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Physicians should advise their patients to search for information using the term "developmental dysplasia of the hip" or, better yet, should refer patients to Web sites that they have personally reviewed for content and clarity. Orthopaedic surgeons, professional societies, and search engines should undertake efforts to ensure that patients have access to information about DDH that is both accurate and easily understandable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23653022     DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e31827d0dd2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  12 in total

1.  Kinesiology taping and the world wide web: a quality and content analysis of internet-based information.

Authors:  Bryan G Beutel; Dennis A Cardone
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2014-10

2.  Evaluation of the Quality, Accuracy, and Readability of Online Patient Resources for the Management of Articular Cartilage Defects.

Authors:  Dean Wang; Rohit G Jayakar; Natalie L Leong; Michael P Leathers; Riley J Williams; Kristofer J Jones
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 3.  Social media and your practice: navigating the surgeon-patient relationship.

Authors:  Alexander S McLawhorn; Ivan De Martino; Keith A Fehring; Peter K Sculco
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-12

4.  The Quality of Open-Access Video-Based Orthopaedic Instructional Content for the Shoulder Physical Exam is Inconsistent.

Authors:  Ekaterina Urch; Samuel A Taylor; Elizabeth Cody; Peter D Fabricant; Jayme C Burket; Stephen J O'Brien; David M Dines; Joshua S Dines
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2016-06-29

5.  Stem Cells in Orthopedic Web Information: An Assessment with the DISCERN Tool.

Authors:  Michele Venosa; Alessio Tarantino; Irene Schettini; Roberto Padua; Maria Grazia Cifone; Vittorio Calvisi; Emilio Romanini
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 6.  The impact of health literacy in the care of surgical patients: a qualitative systematic review.

Authors:  Gildasio S De Oliveira; Robert J McCarthy; Michael S Wolf; Jane Holl
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Bad News: Analysis of the Quality of Information on Influenza Prevention Returned by Google in English and Italian.

Authors:  Ali Maki; Roger Evans; Pietro Ghezzi
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 7.561

8.  The Quality of Online Resources Available to Patients Interested in Knee Biologic Therapies Is Poor.

Authors:  Benedict U Nwachukwu; Ryan C Rauck; Cynthia A Kahlenberg; Chukwuma Nwachukwu; William W Schairer; Riley J Williams; David W Altchek; Answorth A Allen
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2018-08-08

9.  Adding Dimensions to the Analysis of the Quality of Health Information of Websites Returned by Google: Cluster Analysis Identifies Patterns of Websites According to their Classification and the Type of Intervention Described.

Authors:  Mubashar Yaqub; Pietro Ghezzi
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2015-08-25

Review 10.  Online Resources for Rotator Cuff Repair: What are Patients Reading?

Authors:  Brandon T Goldenberg; William W Schairer; Travis J Dekker; Lucca Lacheta; Peter J Millett
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2019-08-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.